Cited by 168Knowledge Management and SharingHealth Sciences Research and EducationKnowledge Management and Technology

10. Management of explicit and tacit knowledge

Open access
Wyatt, Jeremy C·2001·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014107680109400102

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyatt, J. C.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2001-01
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
6-9
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W1864352586
Cited by
168
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
40.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
Keywords
explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge, knowledge management, knowledge management systems
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Problem Solving, State Medicine, Knowledge, Information Management, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review