Cited by 110Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Self-Assessment in Medical Practice

Open access
Evans, A W, Mckenna, C, Oliver, M·2002·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Although assessment of performance will be central to revalidation, to clinical governance and to maintenance of quality in the National Health Service, formal appraisal by a third party will be no more than an annual event for most medical staff.To be fully effective doctors should assess their own clinical performance more frequently, but many lack training in how to do this.Self-assessment is also a valuable exercise in its own right.Benefits include increased morale and motivation as well as improvements in knowledge, communication and performance 1 .This paper sets out the case for devoting more time to the teaching of self-assessment skills. WHAT IS SELF-ASSESSMENT?According to Antonelli 2 , 'self-assessment of knowledge and accuracy of skill performance is essential to the practice of medicine and self-directed life-long learning'.The emphasis on life-long learning is important.In medicine, as in many other professions, individuals are now responsible for determining their own continuing professional development (CPD); and a successful CPD programme demands awareness of remediable weaknesses through continual self-appraisal.Boud 3 defines self-assessment as 'the act of judging ourselves and making decisions about the next step.'An important principle is that assessment must be followed by action (i.e.assessment is not an end in itself).Equally important is Boud's 3 assertion that assessment can be conducted only against benchmarks or criteria.Brown, Bull and Pendlebury 4 make a further distinction between different forms of self-assessment.On the one hand the process may be linked to competency and formal appraisal, with relevance to public issues of accountability, surveillance and control.On the other hand, the emphasis may be on personal development through reflection.Brown and coworkers suggest that these different emphases produce tensions and confusion both in the published work and in practice.The competency approach is useful for demonstrating particular skills, whereas the developmental approach aids understanding and knowledge and encourages personal and professional growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014107680209501013

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-assessment supports the development of clinical skills, accountability, and a well-grounded understanding of professional standards.

    “By encouraging learners to evaluate their own progress and reflect critically on their performance, self-assessment supports the development of clinical skills, accountability, and a well-grounded understanding of professional standardsskills essential for success in medical education and practice [123,126].”
  • Approaches such as selecting appropriate content, providing explicit assessment criteria, encouraging feedback-seeking behaviors, supporting a growth mindset, and offering high-quality feedback improve the accuracy of self-assessment and promote deeper engagement with reflection and meaningful action.

    “These approaches not only improve the accuracy of self-assessment but also promote deeper engagement with reflection and more meaningful action in response to feedback [123-125].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Evans AW, McKenna C, Oliver M. Towards better understanding of self-assessment in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Med Ed 2001; 35:1-20
  2. Brew A. Towards autonomous assessment: using self-assessment and peer assessment. In: Brown S, Glasner A, eds. Assessment Matters in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999
  3. Entwistle N. The impact of teaching on learning outcomes in higher education: a literature review. Sheffield: Committee of Vice- Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom, Universities' Staff Development Unit, 1992 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, A. W., Mckenna, C., & Oliver, M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2002-10
Volume
95
Issue
10
Pages
511-513
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W2113871076
Cited by
110
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
self-assessment, revalidation, clinical governance, medical education, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Career Mobility, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review