Cited by 63Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Large language models will not replace healthcare professionals: curbing popular fears and hype.

Open access
Thirunavukarasu, Arun James·2023·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Peer reviewed: True

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01410768231173123

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unimodal focus on text-based operation does not fully capture the complex and diverse nature of health care practice.

    “While this unimodal focus on text-based operation has been transformative in the medical field, it does not fully capture the complex and diverse nature of health care practice [8].”

    From Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook. (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The main text says clinical practice requires more than responding accurately to queries and includes practical tasks that LLMs are not equipped to replace. That supports the claim that text-based operation does not capture the full scope of healthcare. But the paper does not describe LLMs as uniformly unimodal: it says GPT-4 accepts images as well as text. It also discusses potential benefits in medicine rather than establishing that text-based operation has already been transformative there. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most current large language models (LLMs) are primarily limited to processing and generating textual content.

    “However, most current LLMs are primarily limited to processing and generating textual content.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Ouyang L Wu J Jiang X Almeida D Wainwright CL Mishkin P,, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arXiv 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thirunavukarasu, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Thirunavukarasu, Arun James
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2023-05
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
181-182
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W4377011132
Cited by
63
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
large language models, artificial intelligence in healthcare, healthcare workers, artificial intelligence adoption
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Fear, Health Personnel, Humans, Language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review