CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesWorkplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lean production assessed by Karasek's job demand-job control model

Open access
Schouteten, Roel, Benders, Jos·2004·Economic and Industrial Democracy
DOI 10.1177/0143831x04044831
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Comments on the quality of working life (QWL) under lean production have varied from devastating criticism on the one hand, to eulogistic praise on the other. These contrasting positions can be related to researchers’ opposing societal stances and resulting interpretations, which are reinforced by the methodologies used and the absence of an external framework to judge QWL. Using Karasek’s job demand–job control model, the authors investigate a Dutch plant operating under a lean production (LP) regime in an attempt to resolve the controversy. The jobs in this plant can be placed in Karasek’s quadrant of low job demands and low job control, which means that antagonists of LP are right in claiming that the work is monotonous and repetitive, while the advocates’ claim that workers have sufficient job decision latitude also holds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0143831x04044831

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Burns, T., 1961, The Management of Innovation
  2. Elger, T., 1994, Global Japanization? The Transnational Transformation of the Labour Process, 1
  3. Hacker, W. (1989) ‘Vollstandige vs. unvollstandige Arbeitstatigkeiten’, pp. 463–6 in S. Greif, H. Holling and N. Nicholson (eds) Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union.
  4. Hackman, J.R., 1980, Work Redesign
  5. Kammeraat, R. (2000) ‘Welzijn bij Giant Europe Manufacturing B.V. Een onderzoek naar het verbeteren van het welzijn en het verhogen van de betrokkenheid van de medewerkers op de assemblage-afdeling van een .etsenfabriek’, Master thesis, University of Groningen.
  6. Krafcik, J.F., 1988, Sloan Management Review, 30, 41
  7. Monden, Y., 1983, Toyota Production System
  8. Parker, M., 1988, Choosing Sides
  9. Schouteten, R.L.J., 2001, Balances in Well-Being at Work; Measurements, Determinants, and Improvements of the Quality of Working Life
  10. 10.4159/harvard.9780674366299 · DOI
  11. Wilkinson, A., 2002, International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, 1720

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schouteten, R., & Benders, J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-08
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
347-373
ISSN
  • 0143-831X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7099
DOI
10.1177/0143831x04044831
OpenAlex
W2166125286
Cited by
109
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Economic and Industrial Democracy (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
lean manufacturing, quality of work life, Karasek, job control, job demands, job decision latitude

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review