The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Distress Tolerance in the Use of Specific Emotion Regulation Strategies
Abstract
The present study evaluated the role of distress tolerance (DT), defined as the ability to tolerate negative emotional states, in the use of four specific emotion regulation strategies (suppression, avoidance, rumination, and reappraisal). Undergraduate psychology students (N = 431, 71.7% female; Mage = 19.80 years, SD= 3.71) completed self-report measures online for course credit. It was hypothesized that, after controlling for the effects of anxiety sensitivity and negative affectivity, DT would be negatively associated with suppression, avoidance, and rumination, and positively associated with reappraisal. Consistent with prediction, low DT significantly predicted greater use of suppression, avoidance, and rumination. However, contrary to prediction, DT did not significantly predict reappraisal. These results suggest that individuals who are unable to withstand negative emotions are more likely to use maladaptive regulation strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Further, individuals with low DT may demonstrate more “maladaptive” ER strategies (e.g., rumination, avoidance, emotion suppression) than individuals with high DT (Jeffries et al., 2016; Naragon-Gainey et al., 2017).”
From The relationship between distress tolerance and behavioral activation on anxiety and depression symptomatology in autistic youth: Leveraging self and caregiver perspectives (2024) · cites this paper as Jeffries et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“studies have shown that low distress tolerance significantly predicts the use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, including the suppression of emotions, avoidance, rumination and substance abuse”
From The Factorial Structure, Psychometric Properties and Sensitivity to Change of the Distress Tolerance Scale for Children with Emotional Disorders. (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929 · cited 6×
“Last, the current study utilized a nonvalidated measure of emotion regulation strategies; it would be useful in the future to validate this measure by comparing it with other validated measures of emotion regulation (e.g., Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; Gross & John, 2003) to verify that it is, in fact, assessing t…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialApplied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Henry, N. W., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. R. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2064799 · Cited by 7,242
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x · Cited by 5,172
Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences.
Gross, J. J. (2002) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201393198 · Cited by 4,890 · cited 1×
“Reappraisal is an adaptive emotion regulation strategy defined as changing how one feels about a situation to decrease its emotional impact (Campbell-Sills et al., 2006; Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundHayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.64.6.1152 · Cited by 3,595
Taylor, S., Zvolensky, M. J., Cox, B. J., Deacon, B., Heimberg, R. G., Ledley, D. R., Abramowitz, J. S., Holaway, R. M., Sandin, B., Stewart, S. H., et al. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176 · Cited by 1,866
The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure
Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-005-7955-3 · Cited by 1,730
Theoretical Issues in Behavior Therapy
Reiss, S., & Bootzin, R. R. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,461
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1023/B:JOBA.00000007455.08539.94 · DOI
- Gross J. J., 2007, Handbook of emotion regulation, 3
- 10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152 · DOI · Paper page
- Linehan M. M., 1993, Skills training manual for treatment of borderline personality disorder
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1041 · DOI
- Watson D., 2000, Mood and temperament
- Werner K., 2010, Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–105 of 105
Han, S.-S., & Bae, S. (2026) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2026.2729573
Vitus, D., Montemayor, B. N., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2026) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2026.2734265
Čuturilo, G., Vukosavljević‐Gvozden, T., Gvozden, M., Cukanovic, N., & Batinić, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1963031
Transdiagnostic and clinical predictors of longitudinal misophonia symptoms
Pavlacic, J. M., Gaines, A. N., Witcraft, S. M., Freshley, A., Buchanan, E. M., Cortese, B. M., Sege, C. T., Rheingold, A. A., Uhde, T. W., & Dixon, L. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Cognition · doi:10.3389/fcogn.2026.1945899
Belen, H., & Öztürk, F. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09953-2
“…with previous research, which suggests that individuals with higher levels of distress intolerance struggle to accept negative emotional and physical states that might interfere with the ability to engage in mindfulness practices (Jaso et al., 2020; Jeffries et al., 2016; Larrazabal et al., 2022).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeffries, E. R., McLeish, A. C., Kraemer, K. M., Avallone, K. M., & Fleming, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Corresponding author
- McLeish, Alison C.
- Venue
- Behavior Modification
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-12-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439-451
- ISSN
- 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4167
- OpenAlex
- W2216480565
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr026314-03)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1-RR026314)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- distress tolerance, emotion regulation strategies, emotional suppression, avoidance, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, anxiety sensitivity, negative affectivity, maladaptive emotion regulation, negative emotions
- MeSH terms
- Emotional Adjustment, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review