Cited by 9Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCleft Lip and Palate ResearchSinusitis and nasal conditions

Nasal valve surgery: assessment of quality of life with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory

Open access
Manickavasagam, Jaiganesh, Wong, Smeeta, Varabei, Veronika, Raghavan, Ullas·2014·Ear, Nose & Throat Journal

Abstract

We used the 18-question Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) to conduct a retrospective assessment of quality of life following nasal valve surgery. We telephoned 53 patients who had undergone open rhinoplasty for the treatment of nasal valve collapse over a 2-year period. A total of 39 patients--24 men and 15 women, aged 20 to 50 years (mean: 38)--agreed to participate and answer the questions. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months (mean: 8). The spectrum of possible GBI scores ranges from -100 (maximum negative outcome) to 0 (no change) to +100 (maximum benefit); in our group, the median total score was +56 (interquartile range: +32 to +90.5) and the overall total score was +58. The three subscale components of the GBI--general benefit, physical benefit, and social benefit--were analyzed individually; the respective median scores were +46 (+21 to +71), +67 (+25 to +91.5), and +50 (+17 to +100), and the respective overall scores were +60, +59, and +50. Based on these findings, we conclude that nasal valve surgery significantly improves quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145561314093004-513

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The internal and external nasal valves function together to deliver laminar airflow to the nasal cavities for humidification.

    “The internal and external nasal valves function together to deliver laminar airflow to the nasal cavities for humidification [15].”

    From Functional Rhinoplasty. (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Anatomy section describes both the internal and external nasal valves and says airflow through the nasal valve promotes air conditioning, including humidification. It does not say the two valves work together to deliver laminar airflow; instead, it suggests that turbulence may help humidification. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The deceleration of airflow along with increased turbulent forces contribute to humidification, heating, filtering, and olfaction.

    “The deceleration of airflow along with increased turbulent forces contribute to humidification, heating, filtering, and olfaction [7,15].”

    From Functional Rhinoplasty. (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Anatomy/Physiology passage says nasal airflow optimizes contact with the mucosa and that turbulence may help humidification, filtering, and olfaction. It does not identify airflow deceleration as the cause, and it does not explicitly name heating; the citing sentence also states the turbulence effect more definitively than the source does. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inspiratory nasal airflow follows a parabolic curve through the nasal valve and optimizes contact between the airstream and the mucosal surface.

    “Inspiratory nasal airflow follows a parabolic curve through the nasal valve and optimizes contact between the airstream and the mucosal surface [15].”

    From Functional Rhinoplasty. (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Wardrop PJ, Sim S. McLaren K.Contact endoscopy ofthe larynx : A quantitative study. J Laryngol OtoI2000;114(6):437-40 .
  2. Warn ecke A. Averbeck T, Leinung M. et al. Contact endoscopy for the evaluation of the pharyngeal and lar yngeal mucosa. Laryngoscope 20 I0;120(2) :253-8.
  3. II. Sugar J. Vereczkey I. T6th J. Some etio-pathogenetic factor s in laryngeal carcinogenesis. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Onc ol 1996;15(2-4):195-9.
  4. Ahrens W, [ockel KH, Patzak W, Elsner G. Alcohol. smoking. and occupational factors in cancer of the larynx: A case-control study. Am J Ind Med 1991;20(4):477-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Functional Rhinoplasty.

    Altidor, A., Ferri, F. A., Bakhos, F., & Mascaro-Pankova, A. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.45993 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

    “Inspiratory nasal airflow follows a parabolic curve through the nasal valve and optimizes contact between the airstream and the mucosal surface [15].”
    Background

Authors
Manickavasagam, J., Wong, S., Varabei, V., & Raghavan, U.
Affiliations
Doncaster Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Manickavasagam, Jaiganesh
Venue
Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
Published
2014-04
Volume
93
Issue
4-5
Pages
174-180
ISSN
  • 0145-5613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-7522
OpenAlex
W2418362216
Cited by
9
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ear Nose & Throat Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Sheffield
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
nasal valve surgery, nasal valve collapse, quality of life, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, open rhinoplasty, postoperative outcomes, physical benefits, social benefits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Pulmonary Ventilation, Retrospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Nasal Obstruction, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review