Cited by 170Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Research

Assessing the value of diabetes education

Duncan, Ian, Birkmeyer, Christian, Coughlin, Sheryl, Li, Qijuan, Sherr, Dawn, Boren, Sue·2009·The Diabetes Educator

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes self-management education/training (DSME/T) on financial outcomes (cost of patient care). METHODS: Commercial and Medicare claims payer-derived datasets were used to assess whether patients who participate in diabetes education are more likely to follow recommendations for care than similar patients who do not participate in diabetes education, and if claims of patients who participate in diabetes education are lower than those of similar patients who do not. RESULTS: Patients using diabetes education have lower average costs than patients who do not use diabetes education. Physicians exhibit high variation in their referral rates to diabetes education. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration between diabetes educators and physicians yields positive clinical quality and cost savings. The analysis indicates that quality can be improved, and cost reduced, by increasing referral rates to diabetes education among low-referring physicians, specifically among men and people in disadvantaged areas. More needs to be done to inform physicians about ways to increase access to diabetes education for underserved populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721709343609

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, I., Birkmeyer, C., Coughlin, S., Li, Q., Sherr, D., & Boren, S.
Affiliations
  • Solucia Consulting, Hartford, Connecticut, iduncan@soluciaconsulting.com
  • Solucia Consulting, Hartford, Connecticut
  • American Association of Diabetes Educators (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Published
2009-09
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
752-760
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
OpenAlex
W2137403512
Cited by
170
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management education, diabetes education, health care costs, referral rates, physician referral, quality of care, underserved populations, Medicare claims data, commercial claims data
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Diabetes Mellitus, Patient Care, Medicare, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Patient Education as Topic, Reimbursement Mechanisms, Self Care, Telephone, United States, Cost Savings, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review