Cited by 52Pharmacy and Medical PracticesMedication Adherence and CompliancePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Assessing the effectiveness of pharmacist-directed medication therapy management in improving diabetes outcomes in patients with poorly controlled diabetes.

Open access
Skinner, Jeannine S., Poe, Brett, Hopper, Rebecca, Boyer, Alaina, Wilkins, Consuelo H.·2015·The Diabetes Educator

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare medication adherence rates and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) health outcomes in a sample of underserved patients with suboptimally controlled T2DM (A1C >7%) who had received pharmacist-directed medication therapy management (MTM) to those who had not received MTM. Methods: A retrospective review of 100 patient records was conducted. For the MTM group, a pharmacist engaged patients in patient-centered services to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Non-MTM patients received usual care. Outcomes were A1C, medication adherence, blood pressure, lipids, and creatinine. Group comparisons on clinical outcomes were analyzed before and after matching MTM and non-MTM patients on demographic characteristics. Results: Before matching, the MTM group had a higher rate of medication adherence than the non-MTM group. The A1C levels were lower in the MTM group compared to the non-MTM group. Similarly, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was lower in the MTM group compared to the non-MTM group. After matching, medication adherence rate remained higher in the MTM group than the non-MTM group. Similarly, A1C levels remained lower in the MTM group than the non-MTM group. Conclusions: There is a paucity of research focused on behavioral interventions for improving health outcomes in underserved communities. Our results advance the existing literature by demonstrating a positive association between pharmacist-directed MTM, medication adherence, and glycemic control in a sample of underserved patients with suboptimally controlled T2DM. A prospective pharmacy intervention and examination of long-term effects of MTM on medication adherence and T2DM health outcomes in this population is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721715587563

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present study's results aligned with previous studies that found short-term (<12 months) improvement in HbA1c with clinical pharmacists providing medication management services in similar settings.

    “Our results aligned with those of previous studies52,53 that found short-term (<12 months) improvement in HbA1c with clinical pharmacists providing medication management services in similar settings.”

    From Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Discussion and Results > Clinical Outcomes report lower HbA1c in patients receiving pharmacist-directed medication therapy management at a community health center than in those receiving usual care. But Methods > Study Population describes a consecutive 12-month observation period, not a period of less than 12 months, and the analysis compares groups rather than demonstrating a within-patient improvement in HbA1c. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skinner, J. S., Poe, B., Hopper, R., Boyer, A., & Wilkins, C. H.
Affiliations
Meharry Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Wilkins, Consuelo H.
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Published
2015-05-25
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
459-465
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
OpenAlex
W2119873478
Cited by
52
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000445)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092986)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD007593)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
medication therapy management, pharmacist intervention, type 2 diabetes, uncontrolled diabetes, medication adherence, glycemic control, HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, underserved populations, behavioral interventions, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Pharmaceutical Services, Pharmacists, Retrospective Studies, Program Evaluation, Case-Control Studies, Medication Therapy Management, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review