The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is this about You or Me? Self-Versus Other-Directed Judgments and Feelings in Response to Intergroup Interaction
Abstract
This research demonstrated that both dominant and lower status group members’ responses to interacting with an out-group member can center largely on thoughts and feelings about themselves. Pairs of students (either two White Canadians or one White Canadian and one Aboriginal Canadian) had casual get-acquainted discussions. Consistent with our hypothesis that individuals would tend to frame the interaction in terms of the other person’s evaluation of them, high-prejudice White Canadians felt stereotyped by an Aboriginal partner even though they actually were not stereotyped and even though they themselves did not stereotype an Aboriginal partner. Moreover, Aboriginal Canadians appeared to personalize negative behaviors exhibited by their White partner. These individuals experienced discomfort and self-directed negative affect—but not other-directed negative affect—when their White partner was high in prejudice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Non-White patients, who may be particularly vigilant for signs of prejudice or rejection,68”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Ruggiero, K. M., & Major, B. N. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298248004 · Cited by 47
RetractedLess pain and more to gain: Why high-status group members blame their failure on discrimination.
Ruggiero, K. M., & Marx, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.774 · Cited by 21
RetractedMultiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
A Social Psychologist Discovers Chicago Sociology
Schein, E. H., Hughes, E. C., Dalton, M., & Goffman, E. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258197 · Cited by 7,218
Human Nature and the Social Order
Ginsberg, M. (1941) · Nature · doi:10.1038/148351a0 · Cited by 3,167
The Dynamic Self-Concept: A Social Psychological Perspective
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503 · Cited by 3,089
Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations.
Scott, M. B., & Schlenker, B. R. (1981) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2067758 · Cited by 2,057
Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.
Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.35.9.677 · Cited by 1,956
Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice.
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811 · Cited by 1,689
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x · Cited by 1,448
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Altemeyer, B., 1988, Enemies of freedom
- Devine, P. G., 1996, Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context
- Goffman, E., 1959, The presentation of self in everyday life
- Kenny, D., 1994, Interpersonal perception
- 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.62 · Cited by 1,567
“Furthermore, research by Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001) showed that Aboriginal Canadians appeared to personalize the perceived negative behavior of White Canadians during their interaction and experience discomfort and self-directed negative affect (e.g., self-critical, guilty).”
BackgroundAntecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances
Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80007-7 · Cited by 706
Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002) · Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88 · Cited by 593
“To the extent that Blacks (Shelton, 2000) and other minority group members ( Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ) may, for historical reasons or personal experience, be particularly sensitive to signs of rejection, dislike, or discrimination, they are likely to weigh the negative signals more heavily than the more positive overt…”
BackgroundInfluentialPage‐Gould, E., Mendoza‐Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080 · Cited by 582
“Research similarly suggests that prejudiced attitudes toward a cross-group partner's ethnic group should invoke anxiety in intergroup interactions (Stephan & Stephan, 1985, 2000) and more negative expectations for these interactions (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vorauer, Jacquie D.
- ORCID
- Vorauer, Jacquie D.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 706-719
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W1999615224
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 31.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- intergroup interaction, prejudice, stereotyping, personalization, status differences, Aboriginal Canadians, interracial contact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
