The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is this about You or Me? Self-Versus Other-Directed Judgments and Feelings in Response to Intergroup Interaction
Abstract
This research demonstrated that both dominant and lower status group members’ responses to interacting with an out-group member can center largely on thoughts and feelings about themselves. Pairs of students (either two White Canadians or one White Canadian and one Aboriginal Canadian) had casual get-acquainted discussions. Consistent with our hypothesis that individuals would tend to frame the interaction in terms of the other person’s evaluation of them, high-prejudice White Canadians felt stereotyped by an Aboriginal partner even though they actually were not stereotyped and even though they themselves did not stereotype an Aboriginal partner. Moreover, Aboriginal Canadians appeared to personalize negative behaviors exhibited by their White partner. These individuals experienced discomfort and self-directed negative affect—but not other-directed negative affect—when their White partner was high in prejudice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Non-White patients, who may be particularly vigilant for signs of prejudice or rejection,68”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Ruggiero, K. M., & Major, B. N. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298248004 · Cited by 47
RetractedLess pain and more to gain: Why high-status group members blame their failure on discrimination.
Ruggiero, K. M., & Marx, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.774 · Cited by 21
RetractedMultiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
A Social Psychologist Discovers Chicago Sociology
Schein, E. H., Hughes, E. C., Dalton, M., & Goffman, E. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258197 · Cited by 7,218
Human Nature and the Social Order
Ginsberg, M. (1941) · Nature · doi:10.1038/148351a0 · Cited by 3,167
The Dynamic Self-Concept: A Social Psychological Perspective
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503 · Cited by 3,089
Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations.
Scott, M. B., & Schlenker, B. R. (1981) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2067758 · Cited by 2,057
Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.
Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.35.9.677 · Cited by 1,956
Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice.
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811 · Cited by 1,689
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x · Cited by 1,448
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Altemeyer, B., 1988, Enemies of freedom
- Devine, P. G., 1996, Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context
- Goffman, E., 1959, The presentation of self in everyday life
- Kenny, D., 1994, Interpersonal perception
- 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.62 · Cited by 1,567
“Furthermore, research by Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001) showed that Aboriginal Canadians appeared to personalize the perceived negative behavior of White Canadians during their interaction and experience discomfort and self-directed negative affect (e.g., self-critical, guilty).”
BackgroundAntecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances
Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80007-7 · Cited by 706
Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002) · Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88 · Cited by 593
“To the extent that Blacks (Shelton, 2000) and other minority group members ( Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ) may, for historical reasons or personal experience, be particularly sensitive to signs of rejection, dislike, or discrimination, they are likely to weigh the negative signals more heavily than the more positive overt…”
BackgroundInfluentialPage‐Gould, E., Mendoza‐Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080 · Cited by 582
“Research similarly suggests that prejudiced attitudes toward a cross-group partner's ethnic group should invoke anxiety in intergroup interactions (Stephan & Stephan, 1985, 2000) and more negative expectations for these interactions (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundWhen Prejudice Does Not Pay: Effects of Interracial Contact on Executive Function
Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03437 · Cited by 538
“Recent research suggests that such contact may be challenging, if not threatening, for members of dominant groups (Blascovich et al., 2001), particularly when they harbor prejudiced attitudes toward their interaction partners (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundAmanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017094 · Cited by 555
“Women and minorities tend to notice subtle discrimination to a greater degree than high-status White men (Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami, & Hodson, 2002; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundThe Development and Consequences of Stereotype Consciousness in Middle Childhood
McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402012 · Cited by 524
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36001-6 · Cited by 650
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309359288 · Cited by 497
“As a result, both the listener and the speaker form metaperceptions of how they think they are being evaluated by the other person (Vorauer, 2006; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundReducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology
Burgess, D., van Ryn, M., Dovidio, J., & Saha, S. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0160-1 · Cited by 495
Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination
Fiske, S. T. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002026 · Cited by 492
Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants
Hebl, M. R., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202289010 · Cited by 476
“…stigmatized people can accurately perceive bias and may be attuned to potential signs of this bias in mixed interactions (Kaiser & Miller, 2001; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001) and, as a consequence, have developed coping styles or compensatory repertoires that are activated when they are aware of…”
BackgroundInfluentialStamarski, C. S., & Hing, L. S. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400 · Cited by 589
“…there is a multitude of evidence that women and other stigmatized group members are loath to make attributions to discrimination (Crosby, 1984; Vorauer and Kumhyr, 2001; Stangor et al., 2003) and instead are likely to make internal attributions for negative evaluations unless they are certain…”
BackgroundOn the Nature of Contemporary Prejudice: The Third Wave
Dovidio, J. F. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00244 · Cited by 449
What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based metastereotypes
Finkelstein, L. M., Ryan, K. M., & King, E. B. (2012) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.673279 · Cited by 401
“…2001; Vorauer et al., 1998), and that people expect to be viewed in terms of stereotypes of their groups (Krueger, 1996), especially when they anticipate being perceived or evaluated by outgroup (rather than ingroup) members (Pinel, 1999; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundTo be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions.
Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018474 · Cited by 406
Kteily, N., Hodson, G., & Bruneau, E. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000044 · Cited by 376
“This research illustrated the potency of metaperceptions by showing that they played an even bigger role in affecting the intergroup interaction than the stereotypes participants themselves held about the outgroup (e.g., seeing Aboriginal Canadians as lazy; see also Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundIntergroup Contact and Pluralistic Ignorance.
Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91 · Cited by 377
Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account.
Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.934 · Cited by 362
“…contact with members of racial minority groups may encourage members of dominant racial groups to inhibit or even to actively suppress stereotypical beliefs, anxious reactions, or simply uncertainty regarding how to behave (Goff et al., 2003; Hebl et al., 2000; Plant, 2001; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundMajor, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00547-4 · Cited by 347
Supporting the Aging Workforce: A Review and Recommendations for Workplace Intervention Research
Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., & Hammer, L. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111435 · Cited by 379
Negotiating Interracial Interactions
Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x · Cited by 325
“Members of dominant groups often experience anxiety during interracial interactions because they are concerned about behaving in prejudiced ways (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundVorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Main, K., & Roy, S. A. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690 · Cited by 299
“This focus allowed us to build directly on previous work that has used explicit measures to demonstrate meta-stereotype effects in the context of this relationship (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 1999; Vorauer et al,, 1998).”
MethodSelf-citationExpecting To Be the Target of Prejudice: Implications for Interethnic Interactions
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Salvatore, J. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205274894 · Cited by 284
“Whites’ prejudice expectancies have been the focus of recent work by Plant and Devine (2003) as well as Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001).”
BackgroundVescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. E. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658 · Cited by 288
“…low social status groups (e.g., women and Blacks) are more attentive to the subtle instances of discrimination than are members of high-power, high social status groups (e.g., White men; Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami, & Hodson, 2002; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundInterpersonal Concerns in Social Encounters between Majority and Minority Group Members
Shelton, J. N. (2003) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430203006002003 · Cited by 276
“Despite the assumption in the literature that most Whites are concerned about portraying a non-prejudiced image, there has been little empirical research that examines this interpersonal concern in intergroup interactions (see Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 for an exception).”
BackgroundIt's Not My Fault: When and Why Attributions to Prejudice Protect Self-Esteem
Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., & McCoy, S. K. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203029006009 · Cited by 262
“Consequently, one might expect people who blame rejection on discrimination to be just as angry, and perhaps angrier, than people who blame rejection on a lack of ability or on a “jerk.” Several studies on prejudice illustrate the importance of differentiating between self-directed and otherdirected affect (e.g., Devi…”
BackgroundInfluentialFrey, F. E., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_5 · Cited by 228
“Similarly, when White Canadians perceive that they are evaluated negatively by native, Aboriginal Canadians, they tend to evaluate Aboriginal Canadians more negatively (see Vorauer, 2003; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAn information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction.
Vorauer, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.862 · Cited by 223
Self-citationReducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship
Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Паолини, С., & Christ, O. (2007) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280701680297 · Cited by 216
“There is evidence that intergroup anxiety leads to suspicion towards the outgroup (Henderson-King & Nisbett, 1996 ), intergroup distrust (Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami, & Hodson, 2002 ) and increased concerns for the self (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ).”
BackgroundMacInnis, C. C., & Page‐Gould, E. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568482 · Cited by 245
“…interaction on a single occasion (Avery et al., 2009; Blascovich et al., 2001; Hyers & Swim, 1998; Littleford et al., 2005; Shelton, 2003; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), whereas intergroup contact is typically operationalized as the quantity of intergroup interactions or even close cross-group…”
BackgroundInfluentialPromoting the “Social” in the Examination of Social Stigmas
Hebl, M. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_4 · Cited by 208
“These behaviors may take a number of different forms, the first of which involves misperceiving or overperceiving interactants' behaviors as negative (e.g., Kleck & Strenta, 1980; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
Predicting Behavior During Interracial Interactions: A Stress and Coping Approach
Trawalter, S., Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309345850 · Cited by 280
“The literature has primarily focused on interracial contact that lasts just a few minutes and take place on a single occasion (Dovidio et al., 2002; McConnell & Leibold, 2001; Gailliot et al., 2007; Richeson & Trawalter, 2005; Trawalter & Richeson, 2008; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
A Social Psychological Perspective on Perceiving and Reporting Discrimination
Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2006) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00036.x · Cited by 199
Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes.
Duguid, M. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037908 · Cited by 200
Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
Ironic Effects of Racial Bias During Interracial Interactions
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., & Trawalter, S. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01547.x · Cited by 190
Interracial Interactions: A Relational Approach
Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2006) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38003-3 · Cited by 194
Threatened identities and interethnic interactions
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Vorauer, J. D. (2006) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280601095240 · Cited by 172
“With respect to racial attitudes, higher-prejudice White Canadians are more likely than lower-prejudice White Canadians to believe that First Nations interaction partners will perceive them meta-stereotypically (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ; Vorauer et al, 1998 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationVorauer, J. D., & Sasaki, S. J. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02265.x · Cited by 160
Self-citationRicheson, J. A., Trawalter, S., & Shelton, J. N. (2005) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.4.336 · Cited by 156
“…suppressing stereotypical beliefs, anxious reactions, or the uncertainty regarding how to behave during interracial interactions (see e.g., Devine & Vasquez, 1998; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), but such self–regulatory efforts temporarily deplete cognitive resources (e.g., Muraven & Baumeister, 2000).”
BackgroundRegulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions
Trawalter, S., & Richeson, J. A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.05.008 · Cited by 155
“SpeciWcally, research suggests that interracial interactions are especially likely to heighten concerns about appearing prejudiced (Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), and prompt eVorts to avoid doing so (Plant, 2001), for members of dominant racial groups.”
BackgroundResultDyadic interracial interactions: A meta-analysis.
Toosi, N. R., Babbitt, L. G., Ambady, N., & Sommers, S. R. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025767 · Cited by 151
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Depression: The Integrated Perspective
Cox, W. T. L., Abramson, L. Y., Devine, P. G., & Hollon, S. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612455204 · Cited by 142
“Even in the absence of any actual discrimination, stigmatized group members’ expectations about the stereotypes Others hold (i.e., meta-stereotypes) relate to lower self-esteem and more negative emotions (Vorauer, Main, & O’Connell, 1998; see Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundAge Metastereotyping and Cross-Age Workplace Interactions: A Meta View of Age Stereotypes at Work
Finkelstein, L. M., King, E. B., & Voyles, E. C. (2015) · Work, Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/wau002 · Cited by 142
Vorauer, J. D., & Turpie, C. A. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.384 · Cited by 137
Self-citationValuing Diversity and Interest in Intergroup Contact
Tropp, L. R., & Bianchi, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00472.x · Cited by 136
Let’s talk about race, Baby! When Whites’ and Blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge
Trawalter, S., & Richeson, J. A. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.013 · Cited by 133
“To test our predictions, we employed a data analytic approach at the dyadic level similar to that of Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001).”
Madera, J. M., King, E. B., & Hebl, M. R. (2012) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027724 · Cited by 131
“Group identities play an important role in peoples’ self-concept (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), self-esteem, and self-evaluations (Avery, McKay, & Wilson, 2008; Hogg, 2000; Tsui & O’Reilly, 1989).”
Chapter 1 The Introspection Illusion
Pronin, E. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00401-2 · Cited by 139
Vorauer, J. D., Martens, V., & Sasaki, S. J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013411 · Cited by 126
“…© 2009 American Psychological Association 2009, Vol. 96, No. 4, 811–827 0022-3514/09/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0013411 811 group members’ actual impressions (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), are thought to arise as a function of factors such as lower and higher prejudice individuals’ different levels of…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBrief Report: Thin Slices of Racial Bias
Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2005) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-004-0890-2 · Cited by 122
“Such judgments are likely to be even more difficult to make during actual interracial interactions (e.g., Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ), given that many factors, including individuals’ goals, influence their nonverbal behavior.”
Students' race and teachers' social support affect the positive feedback bias in public schools.
Harber, K. D., Gorman, J. L., Gengaro, F. P., Butisingh, S., Tsang, W., & Ouellette, R. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028110 · Cited by 118
Feeling Misidentified: The Consequences of Internal Identity Asymmetries for Individuals at Work
Meister, A., Jehn, K. A., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0102 · Cited by 116
Śliwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.21 · Cited by 103
“The so far limited research in this area suggests a potential influence of the speaker’s perceptions of her or his use of language on her or his behavior (Cargile et al., 1994; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundWhen fiends become friends: The need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination.
Carvallo, M., & Pelham, B. W. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.94 · Cited by 100
Carryover Effects of Feeling Socially Transparent or Impenetrable on Strategic Self-Presentation.
Schlenker, B. R., & Wowra, S. A. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.871 · Cited by 94
Intergroup Contact: An Integration of Social Psychological and Communication Perspectives
Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Amichai‐Hamburger, Y., & Tausch, N. (2013) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679126 · Cited by 91
“Measuring event-related potentials, Walker, Silvert, Hewstone, and Nobre (2008) showed that differences in Whites’ processing of their own vs. other-race faces were reduced with increased self-reported out-group contact, demonstrating the malleability of internal neural responses through external social experiences su…”
BackgroundInfluentialTargets as perceivers: How people determine when they will be negatively stereotyped.
Wout, D. A., Shih, M. J., Jackson, J. S., & Sellers, R. M. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012880 · Cited by 90
“…that outgroup members hold of their ingroup, enable people to make inferences and expectations about others who are likely to stereotype them (L. M. Brown & Dobbins, 2004; Sigelman & Tuch, 1997; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001; Vorauer, Main, & O’Connell, 1998).”
Littleford, L. N., Wright, M. O., & Sayoc-Parial, M. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2701_9 · Cited by 82
“Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001) reported that minorities are able to detect majority group members’ implicit negative attitudes.”
BackgroundRoutes to Positive Interracial Interactions: Approaching Egalitarianism or Avoiding Prejudice
Plant, E. A., Devine, P. G., & Peruche, M. B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210378018 · Cited by 82
“…LIBRARY on April 13, 2015psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from and, consequently, being evaluated negatively loom large (e.g., Dunton & Fazio, 1997; Plant & Butz, 2006; Plant & Devine, 1998, 2003; Shelton, 2003; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001; Vorauer, Main, & O’Connell, 1998).”
The Case For and Against Perspective-Taking
Vorauer, J. D. (2013) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407188-9.00002-8 · Cited by 84
Self-citationSupport of workplace diversity policies: The role of race, gender, and beliefs about inequality
Scarborough, W. J., Lambouths, D. L., & Holbrook, A. L. (2019) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.002 · Cited by 97
Shapiro, J. R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0011617 · Cited by 80
Butz, D. A., & Plant, E. A. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1066 · Cited by 80
Social Cognition and the Normality of Prejudgment
Fiske, S. T. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470773963.ch3 · Cited by 75
Cognitive costs of contemporary prejudice
Murphy, M. C., Richeson, J. A., Shelton, J. N., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Bergsieker, H. B. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212468170 · Cited by 74
“Members of devalued social groups are motivated to disambiguate such information, becoming vigilant for cues of bias (Murphy, Steele, & Gross, 2007) and monitoring interaction partners to discern their actual intentions and beliefs (Dovidio, 2001; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundStereotypes and Behavioral Confirmation: From Interpersonal to Intergroup Perspectives
Klein, O., & Snyder, M. (2003) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(03)01003-7 · Cited by 72
“…two nonstigmatized versus one nonstigmatized and one stigmatized group member), European Canadian participants experienced more negative emotions (such as remorse, guilt, anger, and hostility) when interacting with aboriginal Canadians than with other European Canadians (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundNeel, R., & Shapiro, J. R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028237 · Cited by 76
“When interracial interactions are difficult, they tend to heighten Whites' concerns about appearing racist (Richeson & Shelton, 2007; Shapiro & Neuberg, 2008; Shelton, Richeson, & Vorauer, 2006; Shelton, West, & Trail, 2010; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000).”
Age and ethnic variation in children's thinking about the nature of racism
McKown, C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.08.001 · Cited by 73
Tewfik, B. A. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1627 · Cited by 80
“They just don't understand us”: The role of felt understanding in intergroup relations.
Livingstone, A., Rodríguez, L. F., & Rothers, A. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000221 · Cited by 77
Паолини, С., Harris, N. C., & Griffin, A. S. (2015) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430215572265 · Cited by 68
“Intergroup anxiety is associated with increased concerns for the self (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), negative emotions (Crandall & Eshleman, 2003), simplified information processing and reduced attention to disconfirming information (Wilder & Shapiro, 1989), increased dominant responses (Islam &…”
BackgroundInvisible overtures: Fears of rejection and the signal amplification bias.
Vorauer, J. D., Cameron, J. J., Holmes, J. G., & Pearce, D. G. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.793 · Cited by 68
Self-citationI Thought We Could Be Friends, but …
Vorauer, J. D., & Sakamoto, Y. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01706.x · Cited by 67
“In the White-White pairs, we randomly selected one pair member to be the participant and the other to be the partner (see Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
MethodSelf-citationInterethnic Interactions: Expectancies, Emotions, and Behavioral Intentions
Plant, E. A., Butz, D. A., & Tartakovsky, M. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430208095827 · Cited by 66
Implicit racial bias and prosocial behavior
Štěpáníková, I., Triplett, J., & Simpson, B. (2011) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.02.004 · Cited by 65
“Although the importance of spontaneous behaviors in interracial interaction should not be downplayed (Dovidio et al., 2002; Vorauer and Kumhyr, 2001; Chen and Bargh, 1997), the lack of evidence linking implicit racial attitudes to deliberate and controllable behavior is an important obstacle to an…”
BackgroundLearning orientation as a predictor of positive intergroup contact
Migacheva, K., & Tropp, L. R. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212455854 · Cited by 62
“For instance, performance orientation of European Americans may arise from concerns about appearing prejudiced or a desire to demonstrate their egalitarian values (e.g., Devine et al., 2005; Dovidio & Gaertner, 2004; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundDo you really understand? Achieving accuracy in interracial relationships.
Holoien, D. S., Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Alegre, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000003 · Cited by 58
“Second, Whites' concerns of being nonprejudiced may hinder accuracy by causing Whites to become self-focused (Vorauer, 2006), scrutinizing their own thoughts and behaviors for signs of prejudice, and consequently diverting their attention away from racial minority partners (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundCollege Students’ Descriptions of Everyday Gender Prejudice
Brinkman, B. G., & Rickard, K. M. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9643-3 · Cited by 57
“Research demonstrates that many people do not label negative events as gender prejudice, even when they experience situations that others have identified as prejudice (Magely et al. 1999; Vorauer and Kumhyr 2001 ).”
BackgroundVauclair, C., Lima, M. L., Abrams, D., Swift, H. J., & Bratt, C. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000125 · Cited by 66
“…0.041, p .001; pity: B 0.022, p .001; contempt: B 0.126, p .001; envy: B 0.045, p .001. perception to the experience of discrimination (Frey & Tropp, 2006; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000), but it is plausible that a more complex bidirectional causation exists (see also Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialMeta-Stereotypes May Hinder Inter-Racial Contact
Finchilescu, G. (2005) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630503500305 · Cited by 54
The positive feedback bias as a response to self‐image threat
Harber, K. D., Stafford, R., & Kennedy, K. A. (2009) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466609x473956 · Cited by 53
Meta‐humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross‐group interaction
Borinca, I., Tropp, L. R., & Ofosu, N. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12435 · Cited by 50
Understanding intergroup relations through the lens of implicit theories (mindsets) of malleability
Rattan, A., & Georgeac, O. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12305 · Cited by 57
“…in interactions (Carr et al., 2012; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; MacInnis & Page‐Gould, 2015; Shelton, Dovidio, Hebl, & Richeson, 2009; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), and insensitivity toward the suffering of disadvantaged groups (Čehajić, Brown, & González, 2009; Harris & Fiske, 2006)…”
Accounting for Lack of Interracial Mixing Amongst South African University Students
Finchilescu, G., Tredoux, C. G., Mynhardt, J. C., Pillay, J., & Muianga, L. (2007) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630703700404 · Cited by 49
“Meta-stereotypes have also been found to influence interpersonal judgement, the expectations and experience of intergroup interactions, and behaviour towards both ingroup and outgroup members (Shelton, Richeson, & Salvatore, 2005; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001; Vorauer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundGreenland, K., Xenias, D., & Maio, G. R. (2011) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.867 · Cited by 48
“1 See also Vorauer and colleagues’ work on metastereotyping (Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001; Vorauer, Main, & O'Connell, 1998; Vorauer, Martens, & Sasaki, 2009).”
Kawakami, K., Karmali, F., & Vaccarino, E. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814715-3.00001-1 · Cited by 41
Valence matters: Positive meta-stereotypes and interethnic interactions
Vezzali, L. (2016) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1208140 · Cited by 42
“First, in line with previous studies (e.g., Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), participants with moderate or high levels of prejudice had more negative expectations regarding the future intergroup interaction when negative meta-stereotypes were activated.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialStewart, M. M., & Garcia-Prieto, P. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.523 · Cited by 47
Younger workers’ metastereotypes, workplace mood, attitudes, and behaviors
Ryan, K. M., King, E. B., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-07-2014-0215 · Cited by 40
The self-fulfilling effects of contemporary sexism: How it affects women's well-being and behavior.
Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Cihangir, S., & Stroebe, K. E. (2009) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11863-005 · Cited by 41
Hated but still human: Metadehumanization leads to greater hostility than metaprejudice
Landry, A., Ihm, E. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220979035 · Cited by 39
“Perceptions of outgroups, such as dehumanization and prejudice, are themselves often influenced by metaperceptions, people’s perception of how an outgroup views their own ingroup (e.g., Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001; Vorauer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundDo Managers' Nonnative Accents Influence Investment Decisions?
Barcellos, L. P., & Kadous, K. (2021) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-2020-0228 · Cited by 39
Sterk, N., Meeussen, L., & van Laar, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01690 · Cited by 42
“This interpretation is consistent with research showing that unambiguous and ambiguous bias both increase negative emotions, but that these emotions are more likely to be directed toward the other when bias is unambiguous, and toward the self when bias is ambiguous (Crocker et al., 1991; Vorauer and Kumhyr, 2001; Elle…”
ResultGómez, Á. (2002) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1174/02134740260372982 · Cited by 36
“Intergroup relations from the perspective of people’s thoughts and feelings about themselves Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001) conducted a study to demonstrate that, independently of their status, people frame intergroup interaction and respond to this interaction based on thoughts and beliefs about…”
BackgroundInfluentialGordijn, E., Finchilescu, G., Brix, L., Wijnants, N., & Koomen, W. (2008) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630803800401 · Cited by 36
Atherton, G., Sebanz, N., & Cross, L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216585 · Cited by 35
Babbitt, L. G. (2011) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0104-4 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vorauer, Jacquie D.
- ORCID
- Vorauer, Jacquie D.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 706-719
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W1999615224
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 31.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- intergroup interaction, prejudice, stereotyping, personalization, status differences, Aboriginal Canadians, interracial contact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review