The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Stress and Desire for Control on Superstitious Behavior
Abstract
Research shows that the frequency of magical thinking and superstitious behavior increases under conditions of stress. A possible explanation for this finding is that stress reduces the individual’s sense of control and that to regain control she or he engages in magical rituals or superstitions. This study tested the validity of this explanation. To this end, the effects of stress on the frequency of superstitious behavior in individuals with high and low desire for control (DC) were examined. The Desirability of Control Scale was administered to 108 participants, half of whom were exposed to low-stress conditions and half to high-stress conditions. They were interviewed and asked questions designed to elicit a “knock on wood” ritual. It was found that the difference in the number of knocks on wood between high-DC and low-DC individuals was greater in the high-stress than in the low-stress condition. Similar findings emerged when the degree of the need to knock on wood, as reported by the participants, was used as a dependent variable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rituals may provide a mechanism for accomplishing this goal (Keinan, 2002).”
From Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy (2014) · cites this paper as Keinan, 2002
In the citing paper
“When people are unable to control and predict their environment, attributional biases are activated and strategies are implemented to restore feelings of control (Keinan, 2002;Underwood, 1996;Vaughn & Weary, 2003;Weary & Jacobson, 1997;Weary, Jacobson, Edwards, & Tobin, 2001).”
From Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy (2014) · cites this paper as Keinan, 2002
Citations
Cites
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · Cited by 4,845
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01537.x · DOI
- Alcock, J. E., 1995, Skeptical Inquirer, 19, 14
- Babani, A. (1994). Matching interventions with individuals’ coping style: The effect of desire for control and method of training on coping with stress . Unpublished master’s thesis, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv.
- 10.1177/0146167295219004 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1976.38.2.579 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1520 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(91)90015-I · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-9984-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-8309-3_8 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.38.3.482 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00994052 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.50 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00209-8 · DOI
- Fisher, S., 1986, Stress and strategy
- 10.1080/21674086.1944.11925575 · DOI
- Folkman, S., 1985, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 88
- Frazer, J. G., 1959, The new golden bough: A study in magic and religion
- Freud, S., 1955, The “uncanny.”
- Freud, S., 1960, Totem and taboo: Resemblances between the psychic lives of savages and neurotics
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.923 · DOI
- Gallup, G. H., 1991, Skeptical Inquirer, 15, 137
- Gmelch, G., 1980, Psychology Today, 75
- Jahoda, G., 1969, The psychology of superstition
- 10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.48 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/jscp.2000.19.2.206 · DOI
- Klein, M., 1987, The selected Melanie Klein, 176
- Lazarus, R. S., 1984, Stress, appraisal, and coping
- Malinowski, B., 1954, Magic, science, and religion
- 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1956.tb06161.x · DOI
- 10.1006/lmot.1994.1012 · DOI
- Matute, H., 1995, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 142
- 10.1080/00224545.1984.9713485 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167282084021 · DOI
- Piaget, J. P., 1929, The child’s conception of the world
- 10.1037/h0082709 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00246.x · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.006 · DOI
- Rozin, P., 1999, The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, 503
- Serban, G., 1982, The tyranny of magical thinking
- Stauffer, S. A., 1949, The American soldier
- Subbotsky, E. V., 1993, Foundations of the mind: Children’s understanding of reality
- 10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1161 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.489 · DOI
- Vago, T., 1992, Superstitious beliefs
- Vyse, S. A., 1997, Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition, 10.1093/oso/9780195078824.001.0001 · DOI
- Werner, H., 1948, Comparative psychology of mental development
- 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1975.29.1.37 · DOI
- 10.2307/1132282 · DOI
- Zusne, L., 1989, Anomalistic psychology: A study of magical thinking
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Keep Your Fingers Crossed!: How Superstition Improves Performance
Damisch, L., Stoberock, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610372631 · Cited by 251
Effects of Anxiety on Spontaneous Ritualized Behavior
Lang, M., Krátký, J., Shaver, J. H., Jerotijević, D., & Xygalatas, D. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.049 · Cited by 158
Illusion of control and behavioral control attempts in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Reuven-Magril, O., Dar, R., & Liberman, N. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.117.2.334 · Cited by 115
Psalms and Coping with Uncertainty: Religious Israeli Women's Responses to the 2006 Lebanon War
Sosis, R., & Handwerker, W. P. (2011) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01305.x · Cited by 95
Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy
Legare, C. H., & Souza, A. L. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12077 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Keinan, G.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University,
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-108
- ISSN
- 0146-1672
- 1552-7433
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review