Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 832

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Venting Anger Feed or Extinguish the Flame? Catharsis, Rumination, Distraction, Anger, and Aggressive Responding

Bushman, Brad J.·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167202289002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Does distraction or rumination work better to diffuse anger? Catharsis theory predicts that rumination works best, but empirical evidence is lacking. In this study, angered participants hit a punching bag and thought about the person who had angered them (rumination group) or thought about becoming physically fit (distraction group). After hitting the punching bag, they reported how angry they felt. Next, they were given the chance to administer loud blasts of noise to the person who had angered them. There also was a no punching bag control group. People in the rumination group felt angrier than did people in the distraction or control groups. People in the rumination group were also most aggressive, followed respectively by people in the distraction and control groups. Rumination increased rather than decreased anger and aggression. Doing nothing at all was more effective than venting anger. These results directly contradict catharsis theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167202289002

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bandura, A., 1973, Aggression: A social learning theory analysis
  2. 10.1521/jscp.1983.1.2.97 · DOI
  3. Berkowitz, L., 1993, Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control
  4. 10.1002/1098-2337(1987)13:1<15::AID-AB2480130104>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  5. Breuer, J., 1955, Studies on hysteria
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.17 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.367 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bushman, B. J., 2001, Chewing on it can chew you up: Effects of rumination on displaced aggression triggered by a minor event
  9. Cohen, J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  10. 10.1037/h0024567 · DOI
  11. 10.3758/BF03332585 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.143 · DOI
  13. 1993, Vogue, 183, 176
  14. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_5 · DOI
  15. Geen, R. G., 1989, Handbook of psychophysiology, 261
  16. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60353-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<199::AID-AB2480210303>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  18. Hornberger, R. H., 1959, American Psychologist, 14, 354
  19. Konecni, V. J., 1974, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 192
  20. Lee, J., 1993, Facing the fire: Experiencing and expressing anger appropriately
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.176 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1177/0146167283091012 · DOI
  23. Sullivan, A., 1999, New York Times Magazine, 50
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01430.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/h0028063 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0022-1031(66)90077-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Zillmann, D., 1979, Hostility and aggression
  28. 10.1016/S0022-1031(72)80005-2 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Zuckerman, M., 1985, Manual for the MAACL-R: The Multiple Affective Adjective Checklist Revised

Cited by

See all 832

Metadata

Authors
Bushman, B. J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
724-731
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167202289002
OpenAlex
W2130713906
Cited by
832
References
7
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.