CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 505Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Individual Differences in the Tendency to Forgive: Construct Validity and Links with Depression

Open access
Brown, Ryan P.·2003·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167203029006008
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Four studies examine the construct validity of the Tendency to Forgive Scale (TTF), a brief measure of dispositional forgiveness. Study 1 showed that romantic partners' ratings of targets converged with targets' self-ratings, and Study 2 demonstrated that higher scores on the TTF were associated with lower offense accessibility. Study 3 examined the TTF's relation to self-reported depression symptoms, both independent of and interacting with attitudes toward forgiveness and dispositional vengeance. Lower TTF scores were associated with higher degrees of depression, especially for individuals with positive attitudes toward forgiveness or those low in dispositional vengeance, although neither of these latter variables displayed significant zero-order relations with depression. Finally, Study 4 examined relations between the TTF, dispositional empathy, another recent measure of dispositional forgiveness, and the dimensions of the Big Five, providing both convergent and discriminant validity evidence for the TTF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167203029006008

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T. & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 65-88). New York: Guilford.
  2. McGary, H. (1989). Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 26, 343-351.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 505

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brown, R. P.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Ryan P.
ORCID
Brown, Ryan P.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2003-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
759-771
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167203029006008
OpenAlex
W2008629635
Cited by
505
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
dispositional forgiveness, construct validity, depression, empathy, Big Five personality traits, romantic partners, convergent and discriminant validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Courtship, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review