Cited by 1,547Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

Gilbert, Daniel T., Pinel, Elizabeth C., Wilson, Timothy D., Blumberg, Stephen J., Wheatley, Thalia P.·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

People are generally unaware of the operation of the system of cognitive mechanisms that ameliorate their experience of negative affect (the psychological immune system), and thus they tend to overestimate the duration of their affective reactions to negative events. This tendency was demonstrated in 6 studies in which participants overestimated the duration of their affective reactions to the dissolution of a romantic relationship, the failure to achieve tenure, an electoral defeat, negative personality feedback, an account of a child's death, and rejection by a prospective employer. Participants failed to distinguish between situations in which their psychological immune systems would and would not be likely to operate and mistakenly predicted overly and equally enduring affective reactions in both instances. The present experiments suggest that people neglect the psychological immune system when making affective forecasts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If a person has been endowed with a life-changing event, their psychological immune system will 'kick in' and over time offset some or even all of the loss in SWB.

    “For instance, if a person has been endowed with a life-changing event (e.g.disability and divorce), their psychological immune system will 'kick in' (Gilbert et al., 1998), and, over time, will offset some or even all of the loss in SWB.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1998
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
617-638
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4255683652
Cited by
1,547
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 62
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056075)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
affective forecasting, immune system, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Cognition, Female, Grief, Humans, Imagination, Male, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Students, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review