CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 172Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complementarity of Interpersonal Behaviors in Dyadic Interactions

Markey, Patrick M., Funder, David C., Ozer, Daniel J.·2003·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167203253474
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An important assumption of interpersonal theory is that during social interactions the behavior of one person tends to invite complementary behavior from the other person. Past research examining complementarity has usually used either confederates or fictitious interaction partners in their designs and has produced inconsistent results. The current study used observational ratings of behaviors of 158 participants as they interacted with partners across three different dyadic social situations. Randomization tests of hypothesized order relations found that the behaviors exhibited during these interactions tended to occur in a circular pattern predicted by the interpersonal circumplex. These tests also indicated support for Leary's (1957) orientation of the control and affiliation dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex and Carson's (1969) notion that dominant behavior induces submissive responses and friendly behavior encourages friendly responses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167203253474

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Snyder, M. & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 883-948). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183-221). New York: John Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–172 of 172

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Markey, P. M., Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Villanova University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2003-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1082-1090
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167203253474
OpenAlex
W1996414399
Cited by
171
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH042427, R01-MH42427)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
complementarity, dyadic interaction, interpersonal circumplex, interpersonal behavior, dominance and submission, social interaction
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Videotape Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review