The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complementarity of Interpersonal Behaviors in Dyadic Interactions
Abstract
An important assumption of interpersonal theory is that during social interactions the behavior of one person tends to invite complementary behavior from the other person. Past research examining complementarity has usually used either confederates or fictitious interaction partners in their designs and has produced inconsistent results. The current study used observational ratings of behaviors of 158 participants as they interacted with partners across three different dyadic social situations. Randomization tests of hypothesized order relations found that the behaviors exhibited during these interactions tended to occur in a circular pattern predicted by the interpersonal circumplex. These tests also indicated support for Leary's (1957) orientation of the control and affiliation dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex and Carson's (1969) notion that dominant behavior induces submissive responses and friendly behavior encourages friendly responses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and the tendency for MDMA to elicit expressions of warm and positive emotions toward therapists is also likely to elicit reciprocal responding from therapists (120, 121).”
From MDMA-Assisted Therapy as a Means to Alter Affective, Cognitive, Behavioral, and Neurological Systems Underlying Social Dysfunction in Social Anxiety Disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [120]
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry
Sullivan, H. S., Perry, H. S., Gawel, M. L., & Cohen, M. D. M. B. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315014029 · Cited by 5,280
Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality
Leary, T. (1957) · Cited by 2,272
Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.
Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.885 · Cited by 2,026
A psychological taxonomy of trait‐descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain
Wiggins, J. S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395 · Cited by 1,596
The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions.
Kiesler, D. J. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.3.185 · Cited by 1,289
Societal structures of the mind
(1975) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(75)80165-1 · Cited by 1,008
The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586 · Cited by 888
Interaction Concepts of Personality.
Hardert, R. A., & Carson, R. C. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094013 · Cited by 696
John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x · Cited by 657
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Snyder, M. & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 883-948). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183-221). New York: John Wiley.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J. M., & Gallo, L. C. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00296.x · Cited by 543
How Interpersonal Motives Clarify the Meaning of Interpersonal Behavior: A Revised Circumplex Model
Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_4 · Cited by 405
Cuperman, R., & Ickes, W. J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015741 · Cited by 397
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0608-3 · Cited by 332
Agentic and Communal Values: Their Scope and Measurement
Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627968 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Markey, P. M., Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Villanova University (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1082-1090
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W1996414399
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH042427, R01-MH42427)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- complementarity, dyadic interaction, interpersonal circumplex, interpersonal behavior, dominance and submission, social interaction
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Videotape Recording
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
