The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empathy-Motivated Helping: The Moderating Role of Group Membership
Abstract
In this article, the authors present two laboratory experiments testing a group-level perspective on the role of empathy in helping. Experiment 1 tested the authors' predictions in an intercultural context of helping. Confirming their specific Empathy × Group Membership moderation hypothesis, empathy had a stronger effect on helping intentions when the helper and the target belonged to the same cultural group than when they belonged to different groups. Experiment 2 replicated these findings in a modified minimal group paradigm using laboratory-created groups. Moreover, this second experiment also provides evidence for the hypothesized psychological mechanisms underlying the empathy-(ingroup) helping relationship. Specifically, analyses in the ingroup condition confirmed that the strength of the empathy-(ingroup) helping relationship systematically varied as a function of perceived similarities among ingroup members. The general implications of these findings for empathy-motivated helping are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Comments on Part I: Psychological essentialism
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989) · Similarity and Analogical Reasoning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863.009 · Cited by 674
Park, J. H., & Schaller, M. (2005) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.013 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis
Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037737 · Cited by 1,126
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003 · Cited by 821
Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0021302 · Cited by 654
Silent disco: dancing in synchrony leads to elevated pain thresholds and social closeness
Tarr, B., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.02.004 · Cited by 341
Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience
Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Rodgers, D. A., Bernardez Sarria, M. S., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.01385 · Cited by 286
Kirby, J. N., Day, J., & Sagar, V. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.03.001 · Cited by 232
Vollhardt, J. R. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0009 · Cited by 204
Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
Intergroup Discrimination: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (2016) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice · doi:10.1017/9781316161579.005 · Cited by 104
Vicarious Fear Learning Depends on Empathic Appraisals and Trait Empathy
Olsson, A., McMahon, K., Papenberg, G., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615604124 · Cited by 92
Oxytocin increases empathy to pain when adopting the other-but not the self-perspective
Abu-Akel, A., Palgi, S., Klein, E., Decety, J., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2015) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.948637 · Cited by 83
Playing with Strangers: Which Shared Traits Attract Us Most to New People?
Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129688 · Cited by 65
A Meta-Analysis of Hiring Discrimination Against Muslims and Arabs
Bartkoski, T., Lynch, E., Witt, C., & Rudolph, C. (2018) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2018.02.001 · Cited by 37
Seeing is believing: communication modality, anger, and support for action on behalf of out‐groups
Glasford, D. E. (2013) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12173 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 943-956
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2096478359
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
