The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Religious Orientation and Prejudice: A Comparison of Racial and Sexual Attitudes
Abstract
Past research on the relationship between religious orientation and prejudice against out-groups has focused on racism. A greater tendency toward racist attitudes has been found among persons with an external religious orientation, whereas an intrinsic orientation has sometimes been associated with tolerance. This study examined the influence of religious orientation on attitudes toward an out-group not widely accepted by contemporary religions: lesbians and gay men. Using questionnaire data from white, heterosexual students on four university campuses, an extrinsic orientation was found to be positively correlated with racism, while an intrinsic orientation was not. Intrinsics, however, tended to be more prejudiced against gay people than were extrinsics. It is suggested that an intrinsic orientation does not foster unequivocal acceptance of others but instead encourages tolerance toward specific groups that are accepted by contemporary Judeo-Christian teachings. The hypothesis is discussed that attitudes toward outgroups serve different psychological functions for persons with extrinsic and intrinsic orientations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414 · Cited by 1,085
Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A Meta-Analytic Review of Religious Racism
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352179 · Cited by 431
Religiosity and Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men: A Meta-Analysis
Whitley, B. E. (2009) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508610802471104 · Cited by 412
Economic Inequality and Intolerance: Attitudes toward Homosexuality in 35 Democracies
Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00352.x · Cited by 371
Hood, Jr., Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Ghramaleki, A. F., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Morris, R. J., & Williamson, W. P. (2001) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00085 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Herek, G. M.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-44
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2071435347
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Religious Orientation and Prejudice: A Comparison of Racial and Sexual Attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167287131003
- The paper
- Herek, G. M. (1987). Religious Orientation and Prejudice: A Comparison of Racial and Sexual Attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287131003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.