Cited by 225Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyParanormal Experiences and BeliefsStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Dimensions of the mysticism scale: Confirming the three‐factor structure in the United States and Iran

Hood, Jr., Ralph W., Ghorbani, Nima, Watson, P. J., Ghramaleki, Ahad Framarz, Bing, Mark N., Davison, H. Kristl, Morris, Ronald J., Williamson, W. Paul·2001·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

In a mostly Christian American sample (N = 1,379), confirmatory factor analysis of Hood’s (1975) Mysticism Scale verified the existence of Stace’s (1960) introvertive and extrovertive dimensions of mystical phenomenology along with a separate interpretation factor. A second study confirmed the presence of these three factors in not only another group of Americans (N = 188), but also in a sample of Iranian Muslims (N = 185). Relationships of the introvertive and extrovertive factors with the interpretation factor were essentially identical across these two cultures, but the Americans displayed a stronger association between the two phenomenology factors. In both samples, the interpretation factor correlated positively with an intrinsic and negatively with an extrinsic religious orientation, and the introvertive factor predicted psychological dysfunction. Associations of the interpretation factor with relative mental health appeared only in the Iranians. These data offered general support for Stace’s phenomenology of mysticism, although the ineffability he linked with interpretation proved to be as much or even more a feature of the introvertive experience, as hypothesized by Hood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0021-8294.00085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hood, Jr., Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Ghramaleki, A. F., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Morris, R. J., & Williamson, W. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
  • Sterling College - Kansas (US)
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
691-705
ISSN
  • 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5906
OpenAlex
W2051861629
Cited by
225
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
mysticism, ineffability, religious orientation, psychological dysfunction, mental health, cross-cultural comparison, American Christians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review