Cited by 596Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Causal Attributions: The Revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII)

McAuley, Edward, Duncan, Terry E., Russell, Daniel W.·1992·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Although attribution theory continues to be a fertile area of social psychological research, much of the extant literature has suffered from questionable measurement of the constructs of interest. This is especially true in the case of assigning causal attributions placement in theorized dimensional space. Russell's (1982) Causal Dimension Scale represented an important development toward more precise measurement of causal dimensions; however, it has been criticized on a number of fronts. The present report presents the rationale for and initial psychometric properties of a revised version of the scale, the CDSII. Employing data from four studies, a confirmatory factor analysis is reported examining the goodness of fit of the hypothesized four factor oblique structure to the data. The results are discussed in terms of possible applications of the CDSII and the need for further validity testing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167292185006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CDS-II is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to challenges in one's life, and contains four 3-item subscales: locus of causality, external control, stability, and personal control.

    “The CDS-II (McAuley et al., 1992) is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to the challenges in one's life.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.2466/pr0.1985.56.2.415 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90037-9 · DOI
  4. Anderson, C, A., 1985, Attribution Basic issues and applications, 235
  5. 10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.16 · DOI
  6. Bandura, A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action
  7. 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
  9. Betancourt, H., 1990, Attribution theory: Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict, 205
  10. 10.2307/256115 · DOI
  11. Fincham, F. D., 1990, Attribution theory: Applications to achievement mental health, and interpersonal conflict, 161
  12. 10.1086/208978 · DOI
  13. Jöreskog, K. G., 1989, LISREL VVI user's guide
  14. 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.625 · DOI
  15. Lewis, E. M., 1990, Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x · DOI
  17. 10.1123/jsp.6.2.184 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
  19. 10.1123/jsep.13.4.382 · DOI
  20. McAuley, E., 1992, Advances in sport psychology, 101
  21. 10.1123/jsep.11.2.187 · DOI
  22. McAuley, E., 1990, Attribution theory: Application to achievement, metal health, and interpersonal conflict, 37
  23. 10.1123/jsep.11.2.187 · DOI
  24. 10.1123/jsp.5.1.72 · DOI
  25. McAuley, K., 1990, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 591
  26. 10.1123/jsp.5.3.278 · DOI
  27. 10.1123/jsep.11.1.84 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/B978-0-12-010605-9.50009-X · DOI
  29. Nunnally, J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory
  30. 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1137 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1174 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1248 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0021-843X.88.3.242 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/1130296 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00834.x · DOI
  36. 10.1123/jsp.9.2.161 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.704 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.4.530 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.4.530 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.287 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Oregon Social Learning Center (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1992-10
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
566-573
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2023956743
Cited by
596
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
causal attribution, attribution theory, scale development, psychometric properties, factor structure, construct measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review