The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Causal Attributions: The Revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII)
Abstract
Although attribution theory continues to be a fertile area of social psychological research, much of the extant literature has suffered from questionable measurement of the constructs of interest. This is especially true in the case of assigning causal attributions placement in theorized dimensional space. Russell's (1982) Causal Dimension Scale represented an important development toward more precise measurement of causal dimensions; however, it has been criticized on a number of fronts. The present report presents the rationale for and initial psychometric properties of a revised version of the scale, the CDSII. Employing data from four studies, a confirmatory factor analysis is reported examining the goodness of fit of the hypothesized four factor oblique structure to the data. The results are discussed in terms of possible applications of the CDSII and the need for further validity testing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CDS-II is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to challenges in one's life, and contains four 3-item subscales: locus of causality, external control, stability, and personal control.
“The CDS-II (McAuley et al., 1992) is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to the challenges in one's life.”
From Examining Counselor Trainees’ Clinical Impressions of Pornography Use: Implications for Couple and Family Counselors (2026) · cites this paper as McAuley et al., 1992
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.87.1.49 · Cited by 7,121
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.2466/pr0.1985.56.2.415 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90037-9 · DOI
- Anderson, C, A., 1985, Attribution Basic issues and applications, 235
- 10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.16 · DOI
- Bandura, A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action
- 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- Betancourt, H., 1990, Attribution theory: Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict, 205
- 10.2307/256115 · DOI
- Fincham, F. D., 1990, Attribution theory: Applications to achievement mental health, and interpersonal conflict, 161
- 10.1086/208978 · DOI
- Jöreskog, K. G., 1989, LISREL VVI user's guide
- 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.625 · DOI
- Lewis, E. M., 1990, Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x · DOI
- 10.1123/jsp.6.2.184 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsep.13.4.382 · DOI
- McAuley, E., 1992, Advances in sport psychology, 101
- 10.1123/jsep.11.2.187 · DOI
- McAuley, E., 1990, Attribution theory: Application to achievement, metal health, and interpersonal conflict, 37
- 10.1123/jsep.11.2.187 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsp.5.1.72 · DOI
- McAuley, K., 1990, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 591
- 10.1123/jsp.5.3.278 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsep.11.1.84 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-010605-9.50009-X · DOI
- Nunnally, J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory
- 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1137 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1174 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1248 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.88.3.242 · DOI
- 10.2307/1130296 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00834.x · DOI
- 10.1123/jsp.9.2.161 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.704 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.75.4.530 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.75.4.530 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.287 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Russell, D. W. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702237645 · Cited by 954
Self-citationHong, J.-W., Wang, Y., & Lanz, P. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1785693 · Cited by 130
Price Fairness of Airline Ancillary Fees: An Attributional Approach
Chung, J. Y., & Petrick, J. F. (2013) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287512457261 · Cited by 88
Flinchum, M. R., Bradley, L. J., Noble, N., & Jung, K. (2026) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/10664807261505019
Metadata
- Authors
- McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Oregon Social Learning Center (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 566-573
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2023956743
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- causal attribution, attribution theory, scale development, psychometric properties, factor structure, construct measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review