Cited by 954Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Russell, Daniel W.·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

An examination of the use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis by researchers publishing in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin over the previous 5 years is presented, along with a review of recommended methods based on the recent statistical literature. In the case of exploratory factor analysis, an examination and recommendations concerning factor extraction procedures, sample size, number of measured variables, determining the number of factors to extract, factor rotation, and the creation of factor scores are presented. These issues are illustrated via an exploratory factor analysis of data from the University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale. In the case of confirmatory factor analysis, an examination and recommendations concerning model estimation, evaluating model fit, sample size, the effects of non-normality of the data, and missing data are presented. These issues are illustrated via a confirmatory factor analysis of data from the Revised Causal Dimension Scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014616702237645

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCA was used in place of factor analysis for the ASQ, which is not recommended in scale development, and might have implications for interpretation of the structure of the ASQ.

    “Principal component analysis (PCA) was used in place of factor analysis, which is not recommended in scale development, and as such might have implications for interpretation of the structure of the ASQ (see Russell (2002) for a review).”

    From Psychometric properties of acceptance measures: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Russell (2002)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, D. W.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Russell, Daniel W.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2002-12
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
1629-1646
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2019718024
Cited by
954
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 33
FWCI
29.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, factor extraction, factor rotation, sample size, number of factors, model fit, non-normality, missing data, model estimation, loneliness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review