The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers
Abstract
A conceptual analysis is offered that differentiates four motives for acting for the public good: egoism, collectivism, altruism, and principlism. Differentiation is based on identification of a unique ultimate goal for each motive. For egoism, the ultimate goal is self-benefit; for collectivism, it is to increase group welfare; for altruism, to increase one or more other individuals' welfare; for principlism, to uphold one or more moral principles. Advocates claim that these last three motives cannot be reduced to egoism. Evidence for this claim is limited, however, especially for collectivism and principlism. It is hoped that the conceptual distinctions proposed will permit broader, more precise empirical study of nonegoistic motives for acting for the public good.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035519 · Cited by 2,559
Dawes, R. M. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125 · Cited by 2,022
Krebs, D. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1134 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 · Cited by 3,401
THE STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCERN FOR SELF, OTHER PEOPLE, AND THE BIOSPHERE
WESLEY SCHULTZ, P. (2001) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227 · Cited by 1,917
Schultz, P. W. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00174 · Cited by 1,081
What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms
Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015 · Cited by 1,016
Compassion in Organizational Life
Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764203260211 · Cited by 671
Metadata
- Authors
- Batson, C. D.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 603-610
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2169495330
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167294205016
- The paper
- Batson, C. D. (1994). Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
