The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attributional Style, Depression, and Loneliness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Chinese Students
Abstract
Completing measures of attributional style, depression, and loneliness were 198 college students from the East China Normal University in Shanghai, China, and 193 participants from the University of Missouri at Columbia. Students from China accepted more responsibility for interpersonal and noninterpersonal failures than did U.S. students. They also took less credit for interpersonal success than did U.S. students. These relatively maladaptive attributional styles by Chinese students accounted for much of their relatively higher scores on depression and loneliness. The sample differences in attributional style fit well with previous research showing that the United States is a relatively more independent culture and that China is a relatively more interdependent culture. Finally, the observed relations between attributional style and depression and loneliness were very similar across these two samples, perhaps reflecting cross-cultural generality of fundamental human needs for feeling efficacious. Implications for attribution theories and models of cross-cultural differences were discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949 · Cited by 1,537
External validity of "trivial" experiments: The case of laboratory aggression.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037//1089-2680.1.1.19 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Cited by
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60 · Cited by 885
Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do
Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280802613866 · Cited by 874
Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00611 · Cited by 717
In Search of East Asian Self-Enhancement
Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294587 · Cited by 590
Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: a behavioural genetic analysis
Matthews, T., Danese, A., Wertz, J., Odgers, C. L., Ambler, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Arseneault, L. (2016) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1178-7 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, C. A.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 482-499
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2143033630
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributional Style, Depression, and Loneliness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Chinese Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167299025004007
- The paper
- Anderson, C. A. (1999). Attributional Style, Depression, and Loneliness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Chinese Students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.