Cited by 590Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

In Search of East Asian Self-Enhancement

Heine, Steven J., Hamamura, Takeshi·2007·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

A meta-analysis of published cross-cultural studies of self-enhancement reveals pervasive and pronounced differences between East Asians and Westerners. Across 91 comparisons, the average cross-cultural effect was d = .84. The effect emerged in all 30 methods, except for comparisons of implicit self-esteem. Within cultures, Westerners showed a clear self-serving bias (d = .87), whereas East Asians did not (d = -.01), with Asian Americans falling in between (d = .52). East Asians did self-enhance in the methods that involved comparing themselves to average but were self-critical in other methods. It was hypothesized that this inconsistency could be explained in that these methods are compromised by the "everyone is better than their group's average effect" (EBTA). Supporting this rationale, studies that were implicated by the EBTA reported significantly larger self-enhancement effect for all cultures compared to other studies. Overall, the evidence converges to show that East Asians do not self-enhance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868306294587

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • North Americans, compared to East Asians, are especially likely to show self-enhancing biases in social perception.

    “North Americans, compared to East Asians, are also especially likely to show self-enhancing biases in social perception (Heine & Hamamura, 2007;Kitayama et al., 1997), which may make them especially motivated to derogate and distance themselves from victims of misfortune as a way to defend their view of themselves as good people subject to just processes.”

    From Victim blaming and belief in karma (2024) · cites this paper as Heine & Hamamura, 2007

  • Self-enhancement motives tend to be weaker, or even reversed, in Asian samples.

    “Self-enhancement motives tend to be weaker, or even reversed, in Asian samples (Heine & Hamamura, 2007;Kitayama et al., 1997)”

    From Victim blaming and belief in karma (2024) · cites this paper as Heine & Hamamura, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Heine, Steven J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2007-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
4-27
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2053197653
Cited by
590
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 33
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh060155-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH060155-01A2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-enhancement, self-serving bias, East Asian culture, cross-cultural comparison, self-criticism, Asian Americans, self-esteem, implicit self-esteem
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Humans, Motivation, Self Concept, Social Identification, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review