Cited by 458Psychology of Social InfluenceCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Compliance with a Request in Two Cultures: The Differential Influence of Social Proof and Commitment/Consistency on Collectivists and Individualists

Cialdini, Robert B., Wosinska, Wilhelmina, Barrett, Daniel W., Butner, Jonathan, Gornik-Durose, Malgorzata·1999·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

University students in Poland and the United States, two countries that differ in individualistic-collectivistic orientation, indicated their willingness to comply with a request to participate without pay in a marketing survey. Half were asked to do so after considering information regarding their own history of compliance with such requests, whereas the other half were asked to do so after considering information regarding their peers’ history of such compliance. This was designed to assess the impact of two social influence principles (commitment/consistency and social proof, respectively) on participants’ decisions. As expected, although both principles were influential across cultures, the commitment/consistency principle had greater impact on Americans, whereas the social proof principle had greater impact on Poles. Additional analyses indicated that this effect was due principally, but not entirely, to participants’ personal individualistic-collectivistic orientations rather than to the dominant individualistic-collectivistic orientation of their cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167299258006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Silesia, Poland
Corresponding author
Cialdini, Robert B.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1999-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1242-1253
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1971119872
Cited by
458
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
compliance, social influence, social validation, individualism-collectivism, cross-cultural comparison, cultural orientation, peer influence, Poland, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review