Compliance with a Request in Two Cultures: The Differential Influence of Social Proof and Commitment/Consistency on Collectivists and Individualists
Abstract
University students in Poland and the United States, two countries that differ in individualistic-collectivistic orientation, indicated their willingness to comply with a request to participate without pay in a marketing survey. Half were asked to do so after considering information regarding their own history of compliance with such requests, whereas the other half were asked to do so after considering information regarding their peers’ history of such compliance. This was designed to assess the impact of two social influence principles (commitment/consistency and social proof, respectively) on participants’ decisions. As expected, although both principles were influential across cultures, the commitment/consistency principle had greater impact on Americans, whereas the social proof principle had greater impact on Poles. Additional analyses indicated that this effect was due principally, but not entirely, to participants’ personal individualistic-collectivistic orientations rather than to the dominant individualistic-collectivistic orientation of their cultures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the context of mortality salience, where social connections are threatened, anthropomorphic products become vital channels for re-establishing social ties and a sense of belonging.
“In the context of mortality salience, where social connections are threatened, anthropomorphic products become vital channels for re-establishing social ties and a sense of belonging [30].”
From Anthropomorphic Design in Mortality Salience Situations: Exploring Emotional and Non-Emotional Mechanisms Enhancing Consumer Purchase Intentions (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241 · see citing works
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995 · see citing works
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926 · see citing works
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · see citing works
Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.
Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023552 · Cited by 1,637 · cited 2× · see citing works
“One compliance tactic that relies on the commitment/consistency principle for its effectiveness is the foot-in-the-door technique (Freedman & Fraser, 1966).”
BackgroundMethodPersuasion and Culture: Advertising Appeals in Individualistic and Collectivistic Societies
Han, S.-P., & Shavitt, S. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1016 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077 · see citing works
Self-citationCheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415130402 · Cited by 1,286 · see citing works
AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance
Adam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7 · Cited by 1,195 · see citing works
“Furthermore, our sample consisted of only German participants, so that future researchers may want to test the investigated effects in other cultural contexts (e.g., Cialdini et al. 1999).”
BackgroundTaras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018938 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
Experiences of Autonomy and Control Among Chinese Learners: Vitalizing or Immobilizing?
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Zou, X., Tam, K.-P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016399 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Luyckx, K. (2006) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9041-x · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Zhao, L., Mao, H., Compton, B. J., Peng, J., Fu, G., Fang, F., Heyman, G. D., & Lee, K. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100455 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions
Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9335-y · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Towards relatable explainable AI with the perceptual process
Zhang, W., & Lim, B. Y. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501826 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Scam Compliance and the Psychology of Persuasion
Modic, D., & Lea, S. E. G. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2364464 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Sun, C., Ding, Y., Wang, X., & Meng, X. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14111041 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“In the context of mortality salience, where social connections are threatened, anthropomorphic products become vital channels for re-establishing social ties and a sense of belonging [30].”
Bhattacharyya, S., Chatterjee, N., & Ramanathan, A. (2025) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-025-00193-8 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Silesia, Poland
- Corresponding author
- Cialdini, Robert B.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1242-1253
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W1971119872
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 20.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- compliance, social influence, social validation, individualism-collectivism, cross-cultural comparison, cultural orientation, peer influence, Poland, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review