PreprintCited by 56Psychology of Social InfluenceDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

Scam Compliance and the Psychology of Persuasion

Open access
Modic, David, Lea, Stephen E. G.·2013·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2364464

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalisation to the victim's circumstances and context increases the likelihood of compliance.

    “The personalisation to the victim's circumstances and context also increases the likelihood of compliance (Modic and Lea 2013).”

    From The Language of Romance Crimes (2024) · cites this paper as Modic and Lea 2013

  • A susceptibility to persuasion scale has been developed with the intention to predict likelihood of becoming scammed.

    “Similarly, a susceptibility to persuasion scale has been developed with the intention to predict likelihood of becoming scammed. 12,13”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modic, D., & Lea, S. E. G.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Modic, David
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1825703860
Cited by
56
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
susceptibility to persuasion, persuasion, fraud, social influence, self-control, scale development, risk perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review