Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial on Perioperative Feeding With an Arginine‐, Omega‐3 Fatty Acid‐, and RNA‐Enriched Enteral Diet: Effect on Host Response and Nutritional Status

Gianotti, Luca, Braga, Marco, Fortis, Claudio, Soldini, Laura, Vignali, Andrea, Colombo, Stefania, Radaelli, Giovanni, Di Carlo, Valerio·1999·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The use of immune‐enhancing enteral diets in the postoperative period has given contrasting results. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double‐blinded clinical study was to evaluate the effect of immunonutrition given perioperatively on cytokine release and nutritional parameters. Methods: Patients with cancer of the stomach or colo‐rectum were eligible. Subjects consumed 1 L/d of either a control enteral formula (n = 25; control group) or a formula supplemented with arginine, omega‐3 fatty acids, and RNA (n = 25; verum group) for 1 week before surgery. Both formulas were given by mouth. Six hours after the operation, jejunal infusion with the same diets was started and maintained for 7 days. Blood was drawn at different time points to assess albumin, prealbumin (PA), transferrin, cholinesterase activity, retinol binding protein (RBP), interleukin‐2 receptors alpha (IL‐2Rα), IL‐6, and IL‐1 soluble receptors (IL‐1RII). The composite score of delayed hypersensitivity response (DHR) to skin test also was determined (the higher the score, the lower the immune response). Results: During the 7 days of presurgical feeding, none of the above parameters changed in either group. Eight days after operation, in the control group, the concentration of PA and RBP was lower than in the verum group (0.18 us 0.26 g/L for PA and 30.5 us 38.7 mg/L for RBP; p <.05). IL‐2Rα concentration was 507 pg/mL in the verum group us 238 pg/mL in the control group (p <.001), whereas IL‐6 and IL‐1RII were higher in the control group than in the verum group (104 us 49 and 328 us 183 pg/mL, respectively; p <.01). The DHR score was 0.68 in the control group us 0.42 in the verum group (p <.05). Conclusions: Perioperative feeding with a supplemented enteral diet modulates cytokine production and enhances cell‐mediated immunity and the synthesis of short half‐life proteins. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 23:314–320, 1999)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607199023006314

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Gianotti, L., Braga, M., Fortis, C., Soldini, L., Vignali, A., Colombo, S., Radaelli, G., & Di Carlo, V.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
314-320
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2063326080
Cited by
170
References
2
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial on Perioperative Feeding With an Arginine‐, Omega‐3 Fatty Acid‐, and RNA‐Enriched Enteral Diet: Effect on Host Response and Nutritional Status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0148607199023006314
The paper
Gianotti, L., Braga, M., Fortis, C., Soldini, L., Vignali, A., Colombo, S., Radaelli, G., & Di Carlo, V. (1999). A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial on Perioperative Feeding With an Arginine‐, Omega‐3 Fatty Acid‐, and RNA‐Enriched Enteral Diet: Effect on Host Response and Nutritional Status. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607199023006314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.