The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment
Abstract
We explore factors associated with employee adjustment to virtual work. In particular, we explore structural factors (i.e., work independence and evaluation criteria) and relational factors (i.e., trust and organizational connectedness) as predictors of adjustment to virtual work. Additionally, we explore age, virtual work experience and gender as moderators of the relationships. We find that structural and relational factors are important predictors of adjustment and that the strength of the relationship is contingent upon individual differences. We explore the implications of these findings for future research and for practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lower-quality virtual communication between managers and colleagues can leave individuals unclear about their goals and priorities, and how they should achieve them114.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Aiken, L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
- Argyris, C., 1985, Strategy, change and defensive routines
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- Bentler, P. M., 1995, EQS Structural equation program manual
- 10.2307/2393738 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1534-0856(00)03008-5 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.598 · DOI
- Cascio, W. F., 2000, Academy of Management Executive, 14, 81
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00863.x · DOI
- 10.4135/9781452243610.n2 · DOI
- Cronbach, L. J., 1987, Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 102, 414
- Davidow, W. H., 1992, The virtual corporation
- DeSanctis, G., 1999, Trends in Organizational Behavior, 81
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447 · DOI
- Gambetta, D., 1988, Trust
- 10.5465/amr.1994.9412190215 · DOI
- Garud, R., 1999, Virtual organizations: Distributed in time and space
- Golembiewski, R., 1975, Theories of group process, 131
- Graen, G., 1987, Research in Organizational Behavior, 175
- 10.1016/0090-2616(93)90078-F · DOI
- Handy, C., 1995, Harvard Business Review, 73, 40
- Hedberg, B., 1994, Imaginary organization
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00256.x · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01038.x · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.10.4.500 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.204089 · DOI
- Laud, R., 1983, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 11-A
- Lucas, H., 2000, Technology, 99
- 10.2307/41165202 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0037495 · DOI
- 10.1300/J293v08n01_06 · DOI
- 10.1080/02678378808259172 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393172 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1988.4306784 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.291 · DOI
- O’Hara-Devereaux, M., 1994, Global work: bridging distance, culture and time
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb00194.x · DOI
- 10.2307/248992 · DOI
- Raghuram, S., 1998, Journal of Strategy and Business, 10, 7
- 10.5465/amr.1997.9707154067 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2393868 · DOI
- Ryan, K. D., 1998, Driving fear out of the workplace: creating the high-trust, high-performance organization
- 10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.211 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199707)18:4<377::AID-JOB807>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1985.4278957 · DOI
- 10.2307/255772 · DOI
- Taylor, W. C., 1995, Fast Company
- Thibaut, J., 1975, Procedural justice
- Thompson, J. D., 1967, Organizations in action
- Watad, M. M., 2000, Sloan Management Review, 41, 85
- Wiesenfeld, B. M., Journal of Management
- Wiesenfeld, B. M., 1998, Debating rationality: nonrational aspects of organizational decision making, 195
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.777 · DOI
- Wiesenfeld, B. M., 1999, Trends in Organizational Behavior, 31
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 · Cited by 2,616
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w · Cited by 434
Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters
Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0020 · Cited by 426
Self-citationInformation and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being
Day, A., Scott, N., & Kevin Kelloway, E. (2010) · Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being · doi:10.1108/s1479-3555(2010)0000008011 · Cited by 218
Raghuram, S., Wiesenfeld, B., & Garud, R. (2003) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00040-x · Cited by 156
Self-citationEmployees’ perceptions of relational communication in full-time remote work in the public sector
Jämsen, R., Sivunen, A., & Blomqvist, K. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107240 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfeld, B., & Gupta, V.
- Affiliations
- Fordham University, 113 W. 60th Street, New York, NY 10023, USA
- Stern School of Business, New York University, 40 W. 4th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-405
- ISSN
- 0149-2063
- 1557-1211
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review