The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda
Abstract
Scholars from multiple fields have shown increasing interest in the causes and consequences of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Although this proliferation of research has the potential to significantly improve our understanding of M&A activity, absent is the necessary step of consolidating and integrating extant knowledge. Accordingly, this article develops a framework to organize and review recent empirical findings, principally from management, economics, and finance in which interest in acquisition behavior is high but also from other areas that have tangentially explored acquisition activity such as accounting and sociology. This article identifies patterns and theoretical gaps and provides recommendations for future research aimed at developing a more integrated M&A research agenda for management scientists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
Investor protection and corporate governance
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00065-9 · Cited by 6,848
Cited by
The Process of Postmerger Integration: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K. H., Huy, Q. N., & Vaara, E. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0078 · Cited by 466
Campbell, J. T., Sirmon, D. G., & Schijven, M. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0663 · Cited by 325
Xie, E., Reddy, K. S., & Liang, J. (2017) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005 · Cited by 312
The relevance of political affinity for the initial acquisition premium in cross‐border acquisitions
Bertrand, O., Betschinger, M., & Settles, A. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2438 · Cited by 191
Writing Nonempirical Articles for Journal of Management: General Thoughts and Suggestions
Cropanzano, R. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309344118 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-502
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2109530108
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 108.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206308330554
- The paper
- Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.