The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review of Expatriate Adjustment Research Through a Multiple Stakeholder View: Progress, Emerging Trends, and Prospects
Abstract
This article is a critical review of the expatriate adjustment literature that focuses on studies that have considered other stakeholders in addition to expatriates themselves. To highlight current knowledge in this area, the most important, implicit assumptions that scholars seem to have made and that may have restricted the theoretical and empirical advancement of the literature are delineated. By focusing on these assumptions, this article underscores the importance of other stakeholders in influencing or being influenced by expatriates. This article also highlights three theoretical perspectives as exemplars to extend the existing literature. By so doing, this review identifies gaps and stimulates new research directions on expatriate adjustment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,624
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258214 · Cited by 6,427
Homans, G. C. (1958) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/222355 · Cited by 5,350
Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277352 · Cited by 4,788
Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400 · Cited by 3,864
Knowledge flows within multinational corporations
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::aid-smj84>3.0.co;2-i · Cited by 3,672
Cited by
Lee, L.-Y., & Kartika, N. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.030 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Takeuchi, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-01-26
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1040-1064
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2096841515
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 54.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review of Expatriate Adjustment Research Through a Multiple Stakeholder View: Progress, Emerging Trends, and Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206309349308
- The paper
- Takeuchi, R. (2010). A Critical Review of Expatriate Adjustment Research Through a Multiple Stakeholder View: Progress, Emerging Trends, and Prospects. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309349308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
