The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Future of Resource-Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline?
Abstract
Since the 1991 publication of the first Journal of Management special issue devoted to resource-based inquiry, resource-based theory (RBT) has evolved from a nascent, upstart perspective to one of the most prominent and powerful theories for understanding organizations. Indeed, 20 years after that landmark issue, RBT appears to have reached maturity as a theory. One implication of this maturity is that RBT lies at a critical juncture, one that will be followed either by revitalization of the theory or by its decline. In this introductory article, the authors provide a brief overview of the contributions provided by the commentaries and articles contained in this third Journal of Management special issue on RBT. These contributions center on five themes: interlinkages with other perspectives, processes of resource acquisition and development, the micro-foundations of RBT, RBT and sustainability, and method and measurement issues. Their view is that the commentaries and articles collectively offer a foundation for extending RBT in meaningful new directions and steering clear of decline. They also offer their thoughts about some key opportunities within each of the themes for further revitalizing research involving the RBT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Self-citationToward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 2×
“Landmark work published in 1992 and 1993 further advanced and delineated key elements of the RBV (Amit & Schoemaker, 1993; Kogut & Zander, 1992; Mahoney & Pandian, 1992; Peteraf, 1993).”
BackgroundStrategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425 · cited 13×
“This decade was dominated by frameworks that focused externally, such as Porter’s (1980) five-forces model, but the gradual emergence of the RBV began to redirect attention inside of organizations (Hoskisson, Hitt, Wan, & Yiu, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialStrategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citationUnderstanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700601 · Cited by 3,451
Self-citationA Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146 · cited 1×
“…1996 Tested the resources–performance link while measuring resources directly; winner of Academy of Management Journal’s annual best paper award Conner & Prahalad, 1996 Identified situations where the application of opportunismbased arguments and knowledge-based arguments may lead to…”
BackgroundTheory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Cited by
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 · Cited by 1,700
Toward the development of a big data analytics capability
Gupta, M., & George, J. F. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004 · Cited by 1,445
Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., Krogstie, J., & Giannakos, M. (2018) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0362-y · Cited by 888
Resource-based theory in marketing
Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0336-7 · Cited by 882
Emerging multinationals from mid‐range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets
Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01085.x · Cited by 756
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1299-1315
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2137945789
- Cited by
- 1,525
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 226.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
