The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-National Work-Life Research: Cultural and Structural Impacts for Individuals and Organizations
Abstract
Increasing attention is being paid to the impacts of country-level contexts on the work-life interface. However, lack of theoretical clarity as well as operationalization challenges are significant roadblocks for comparative work-life research. This article provides guidance for cross-national work-life research by conducting a systematic interdisciplinary review of conceptual and empirical work on the country-level cultural impacts (i.e., the values, assumptions, and beliefs shared by individuals with common historical experience) and structural impacts (i.e., the rules and constraints produced by legal, economic, and social structures) on individual experiences of the work-life interface and organizational support for nonwork. Regarding culture, we offer an organized review of work-life research drawing on cultural dimensions, from the most researched dimensions, such as individualism-collectivism and gender egalitarianism, to the least researched. We also point to ways to locate scales and country scores. Concerning structure, we explain how legal (e.g., public policies), economic (e.g., industrialization), and social (e.g., actual gender equality) factors are operationalized with indicators or typologies and review the related work-life research. We carve out a research agenda pointing out untapped cultural dimensions and structural factors and underresearched work-life constructs and calling for more systemic and integrative cross-national work-life research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4132 · Cited by 5,058
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
Work–nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach
Kossek, E. E., Ruderman, M. N., Braddy, P. W., & Hannum, K. M. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.04.003 · Cited by 594
Measurement of Cultural Complexity
Murdock, G. P., & Provost, C. (1973) · Ethnology · doi:10.2307/3773367 · Cited by 306
Methodological and Substantive Issues in Conducting Multinational and Cross-Cultural Research
Spector, P. E., Liu, C., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111310 · Cited by 82
Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures
Ruppanner, L. (2013) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9933-3 · Cited by 77
Cited by
A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and social support.
French, K. A., Dumani, S., Allen, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000120 · Cited by 555
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Telework: Outcomes and Facilitators for Employees
Beauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canonico, E. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior · doi:10.1017/9781108649636.020 · Cited by 134
Beigi, M., Nayyeri, S., & Shirmohammadi, M. (2022) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103782 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-136
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2460430788
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 53.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-National Work-Life Research: Cultural and Structural Impacts for Individuals and Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206316655873
- The paper
- Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2017). Cross-National Work-Life Research: Cultural and Structural Impacts for Individuals and Organizations. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316655873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.