The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Human Resource Management Systems and Their Measurement
Open accessAbstract
In the strategic human resource (HR) management literature, over the past three decades, a shared consensus has developed that the focus should be on HR systems rather than individual HR practices because the effects of HR practices are likely to depend on the other practices within the system. Despite this agreement, the extent to which the fundamental assumption in the field of interactions and synergy in the system holds true is unclear. We present a systematic review of 495 empirical studies on 516 HR systems in which we analyze the development of HR systems research over time and identify important trends, explicitly linking conceptualization and measurement of the HR system. Our findings suggest that the increasingly broad conceptualization and measurement of HR systems and the lack of clarity on the HR systems construct at different levels have hampered research progress. Much of the research to date does not align with the fundamental assumption of synergies between HR practices in a system, the measures have problems and increasingly confound HR systems with related concepts and outcomes, and insufficient attention is paid to the HR system construct at different levels. Overall, we thus still know little about the “systems” element and how synergies and interactions in an HR system operate. We offer actionable suggestions on how to advance HR systems research towards conceptual clarity and construct refinement, focusing both on how to conceptualize, measure, and combine practices in systems and on studying such systems at different levels of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996 · cited 1×
“This approach assumes that HRM is best viewed as a consistent system that has most impact if all practices send consistent signals about the organization’s underlying intentions (Bowen & Ostroff, 2004).”
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: an integrative analytical framework
Edwards, J. R. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810142004 · Cited by 1,128
Incremental Validity Principles in Test Construction.
Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., & Fister, S. M. (2003) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.467 · Cited by 205 · cited 3×
“The item types used are increasingly mixed, resulting in ambiguous scales with heterogeneous items that may not represent the same underlying construct (cf. Strauss & Smith, 2009).”
Influential
Cited by
Human resources analytics: A systematization of research topics and directions for future research
Margherita, A. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100795 · Cited by 410
Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice
Dul, J., Hauff, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2023) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-023-00628-x · Cited by 325
Strategic Human Resource Management and COVID‐19: Emerging Challenges and Research Opportunities
Collings, D. G., McMackin, J., Nyberg, A. J., & Wright, P. M. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12695 · Cited by 266
“Strategic HRM research needs to move toward the more nuanced conceptualisation and measurement of HR practices such as flexibility, job design etc. rather than capturing these under the category of ‘other’ which has been far too common in extant research (Boon et al., 2019).”
BackgroundRen, S., Jiang, K., & Tang, G. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22079 · Cited by 180
Waldkirch, M., Bucher, E., Schou, P. K., & Grünwald, E. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1914129 · Cited by 173
“Furthermore, focusing on worker perceptions limits our understanding of HRM policies, as worker perceptions are not suited for capturing an organization’s intentions and goals (Boon et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Lepak, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-01-14
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2498-2537
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2908779160
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.