The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated Research
Open accessAbstract
As corporations’ environmental impact comes under greater scrutiny by global financial, regulatory, and societal stakeholders, management scholars have increasingly focused on the role of corporate governance as a tool for driving environmental initiatives. Still, we lack a comprehensive and systematic understanding of this emergent body of inquiry and a holistic agenda for future research. To address this gap, our integrative framework relates the key corporate governance actors to environmental sustainability outcomes from the extant literature and highlights its main methodological approaches and theoretical arguments. Our framework provides a critical analysis of what we know and points to the knowledge gaps around owners, boards of directors, CEOs, top management teams, and employees as corporate governance actors. We then highlight limitations in the existing literature as significant opportunities for further research to resolve its ambiguous conceptualizations of environmental sustainability constructs, various methodological and theoretical challenges, incomplete engagement with the global dimension of environmental sustainability, and limited analysis of how corporate governance actors may interact to shape environmental sustainability outcomes. We conclude by proposing novel approaches for addressing these issues, which we believe could generate a better way forward on studying the corporate governance of environmental sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64 · Cited by 3,441 · cited 1×
“…organizational follow-through; Crilly, Zollo, & Hansen, 2012), greenwashing (highlighting environmental efforts while creating environmental harm; Delmas & Burbano, 2011), emergent decoupling (when institutional complexity prevents well-intentioned firms from properly internalizing environmental…”
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 · Cited by 2,547
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 · Cited by 1,797
Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors
Flammer, C. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0744 · Cited by 1,744
Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows
HARTZMARK, S. M., & SUSSMAN, A. B. (2019) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12841 · Cited by 1,711
Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316679252 · Cited by 1,099 · cited 1×
“Methodologically, such research could rely on qualitative comparative analysis to discover different configurations of CG characteristics and other firm-level factors that improve or harm environmental sustainability outcomes (Misangyi et al., 2017).”
Self-citationInstitutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility
Chen, T., Dong, H., & Lin, C. (2020) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.007 · Cited by 975
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198 · Cited by 962
Cited by
Efunniyi, C. P., Abhulimen, A. O., Obiki-Osafiele, A. N., Osundare, O. S., Agu, E. E., & Adeniran, I. A. (2024) · Finance & Accounting Research Journal · doi:10.51594/farj.v6i8.1509 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Aguilera, R. V., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marano, V., & Tashman, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-02-19
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1468-1497
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W3132785017
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 43.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206321991212
- The paper
- Aguilera, R. V., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marano, V., & Tashman, P. A. (2021). The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated Research. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321991212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.