The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers
Abstract
This study developed and tested a path model of individual difference variables as antecedents of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers. Results of path analysis of survey data gatheredfrom 166 managers provided moderate support for the proposed model and the pattern of linkages specified among the variables. Results showed education is negatively related to computer anxiety, and external locus of control and math anxiety contribute to increased computer anxiety. Managers' age, education, external locus of control, and thefeeling-thinking dimension of cognitive style are directly related to attitudes toward microcomputers. However, math anxiety and external locus of control affect microcomputer attitudes only indirectly, through their effect on computer anxiety, which is the strongest predictor of negative attitudes toward microcomputers. Implications for the design and success of management information systems involving microcomputers, andfuture research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A personality scale of manifest anxiety
Taylor, J. A. (1953) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056264 · Cited by 3,131
Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management
Gist, M. E. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306562 · Cited by 1,447
Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students
Betz, N. E. (1978) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.25.5.441 · Cited by 558
Computer anxiety: sex, race and age
Gilroy, F. D., & Desai, H. B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80084-0 · Cited by 206
Differential experiences of men and women in computerized offices
Gutek, B. A., & Bikson, T. K. (1985) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00287905 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165 · Cited by 2,060
The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies
Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., & Roundtree, R. (2003) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00276-4 · Cited by 1,247
Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models
Selim, H. M. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004 · Cited by 1,055
Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2020-0259 · Cited by 986
Metadata
- Authors
- Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-388
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2067007689
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.