The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Fortune Corporate 'Reputation' Index: Reputation for What?
Abstract
This study examines competing measurement models of the Fortune reputation data and argues that, for research purposes, its usefullness is limited to measuring the extent to which a firm is perceived as striving for financial goals. The generalizability of this conclusion is evaluated and past research studies purporting to have measured other constructs ( e.g., social responsibility, quality, stakeholder orientation ) are revisited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.2307/256210 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.4250070505 · DOI · Paper page
- Clarkson, M.B.E. (1988). Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976-1986 . Pp. 241-265 in L.E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
- Conine, T.F., 1986, Corporate social responsibility and investment value
- 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256324 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Fortune, 44
- 10.1177/014920639001600206 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.461 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1986.4282643 · doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4282643
- James, L.R., 1982, Casual analysis
- Jöreskog, K.G., 1989, LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications
- 10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562 · Paper page
- 10.1177/014920639001600112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256342 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0090-5720(90)90023-Z · DOI · Paper page
- Thurstone, L., 1947, Multiple factor analysis
- 10.5465/amr.1986.4282628 · doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4282628 · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1986.4283976 · doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4283976 · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1985.4279099 · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279099 · Paper page
- 10.1177/014662168500900101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/014920639101700206 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services
Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/s0969-6989(00)00029-1 · Cited by 1,072
Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4 · Cited by 984
The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007 · Cited by 930
Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation
Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0015-7 · Cited by 899
Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management
Boon, C., Eckardt, R., Lepak, D. P., & Boselie, P. (2018) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1380063 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Fryxell, G. E., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W1972237209
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Fortune Corporate 'Reputation' Index: Reputation for What? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014920639402000101
- The paper
- Fryxell, G. E., & Wang, J. (1994). The Fortune Corporate 'Reputation' Index: Reputation for What? Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
