The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Country Generalizability of the Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Students’ Strategy Use and Reading Competence
Abstract
Background/Context Because metacognitive knowledge includes knowledge about adequate learning strategies, and because an effective use of learning strategies is associated with higher levels of performance, substantial relationships can be assumed between metacognitive knowledge, strategic behavior, and performance. However, such a pattern of results is rarely found in the research literature. In part, this may be due to inadequate indicators of strategy use. Purpose of study Prior research showed that high scores on self-reported strategy use were only mirrored in high levels of performance when students had sufficient metacognitive knowledge. To test the cross-country generalizability of the relationship between metacognitive knowledge, strategy use, and reading competence, we analyzed data from the PISA 2009-study, in which similar measures of metacognitive knowledge as well as of students’ strategy use were used. Research Design The study uses a cross-sectional correlational design. It draws on representative samples of fifteen-year-old students from 34 OECD countries taking part in the PISA 2009 study. The relations between students’ reading competence scores, their metacognitive knowledge as well as their self-reported use of learning strategies were analyzed. We used correlations, mediation, as well as moderator regression analyses to predict students’ reading competence. Findings/Results Results showed consistently moderate to high correlations between metacognitive k…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Demographic variables such as age and educational attainment have been shown to influence susceptibility to automation bias and reliance on external supports.
“Demographic variables such as age and educational attainment have been shown to influence susceptibility to automation bias and reliance on external supports [6,17,18].”
From From Offloading to Engagement: An Experimental Study on Structured Prompting and Critical Reasoning with Generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Older participants and those with higher levels of education are less likely to rely uncritically on AI outputs, reflecting greater epistemic vigilance.
“Previous work has shown that older participants and those with higher levels of education are less likely to rely uncritically on AI outputs, reflecting greater epistemic vigilance [17,18].”
From From Offloading to Engagement: An Experimental Study on Structured Prompting and Critical Reasoning with Generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.766 · Cited by 2,247
Studying as Self-Regulated Learning
(1998) · Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice · doi:10.4324/9781410602350-19 · Cited by 1,589
Handbook of Metacognition in Education
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203876428 · Cited by 1,509
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf02212307 · Cited by 1,443
Measuring Self-Regulated Learning
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50045-7 · Cited by 1,383
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
- Artelt C., 2000, Strategisches Lernen [Strategic learning]
- Artelt C., 2003, Learners for life. Student approaches to learning. Results from PISA 2000
- 10.1026/0049-8637.41.2.96 · DOI
- Artelt C., 2010, Schulische Lerngelegenheiten und Kompetenzentwicklung, 127
- 10.1026/0033-3042/a000106 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03173188 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- Bempechat J., 2002, Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement, 117
- 10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.845 · DOI
- Borkowski J. G., 1988, Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences, 73
- Brown A. L., 1978, Advances in instructional psychology, 1, 77
- Butler D., 2011, Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 73
- Campione J. C., 1985, Thinking and learning skills, 317
- 10.2307/1129635 · DOI
- Collins Block C., 2002, Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices
- Dunlosky J., 2009, Metacognition
- Flavell J. H., 2002, Cognitive development
- Goswami U., 2008, Cognitive development: The learning brain
- Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking, fast and slow
- Kintsch W., 1998, Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition
- 10.2307/1165955 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203810033 · DOI
- National Reading Panel, 2000, Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. (National Institute of Child health and human Development, NIH, DHHS)
- 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1787/9789264195905-en · DOI
- 10.1787/9789264091450-en · DOI
- OECD., 2010, PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn. Student engagement, strategies and practices
- 10.1787/9789264167872-en · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_7 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410612762 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-006-9014-3 · DOI
- Pieschl S. (2007). To calibrate or not to calibrate? Conditions and processes of metacognitive calibration during hypermedia learning (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Münster, Germany). Retrieved from urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-14569461694
- 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3 · DOI · Paper page
- Pintrich P. R., 1991, The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)
- Pressley M., 2002, Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, 11
- Schlagmüller M., 2007, WLST 7-12. Würzburger Lesestrategie Wissenstest für die Klassen 7 bis 12 [Wurzburg knowledge of reading strategies test for Grades 7 to 12]
- Schneider W., 2010, Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction, 54
- 10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2 · DOI
- Schneider W., 2008, A handbook of metamemory and memory, 391
- Schneider W., 1997, Memory development between two and twenty
- van de vijver F., 1997, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1: Theory and method, 257
- Weinstein C. E., 1987, Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI)
- Wild K.-P., 1992, Arbeiten zur empirischen Pädagogik und pädagogischen Psychologie, 20
- 10.1080/00461520.2010.517150 · DOI
- Winne P. H., 1998, Metacognition in educational theory and practice, 277
Cited by
Sorted by citations
21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World
OECD (2021) · PISA · doi:10.1787/a83d84cb-en · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Artelt, C., & Schneider, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Bamberg (DE)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-32
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2242525186
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- metacognitive knowledge, learning strategies, strategy use, reading skills, self-regulated reading, strategy knowledge, cross-national comparison, PISA 2009, adolescents, moderation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review