Cited by 75Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Country Generalizability of the Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Students’ Strategy Use and Reading Competence

Artelt, Cordula, Schneider, Wolfgang·2015·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Background/Context Because metacognitive knowledge includes knowledge about adequate learning strategies, and because an effective use of learning strategies is associated with higher levels of performance, substantial relationships can be assumed between metacognitive knowledge, strategic behavior, and performance. However, such a pattern of results is rarely found in the research literature. In part, this may be due to inadequate indicators of strategy use. Purpose of study Prior research showed that high scores on self-reported strategy use were only mirrored in high levels of performance when students had sufficient metacognitive knowledge. To test the cross-country generalizability of the relationship between metacognitive knowledge, strategy use, and reading competence, we analyzed data from the PISA 2009-study, in which similar measures of metacognitive knowledge as well as of students’ strategy use were used. Research Design The study uses a cross-sectional correlational design. It draws on representative samples of fifteen-year-old students from 34 OECD countries taking part in the PISA 2009 study. The relations between students’ reading competence scores, their metacognitive knowledge as well as their self-reported use of learning strategies were analyzed. We used correlations, mediation, as well as moderator regression analyses to predict students’ reading competence. Findings/Results Results showed consistently moderate to high correlations between metacognitive k…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146811511700104

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
  2. Artelt C., 2000, Strategisches Lernen [Strategic learning]
  3. Artelt C., 2003, Learners for life. Student approaches to learning. Results from PISA 2000
  4. 10.1026/0049-8637.41.2.96 · DOI
  5. Artelt C., 2010, Schulische Lerngelegenheiten und Kompetenzentwicklung, 127
  6. 10.1026/0033-3042/a000106 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF03173188 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bempechat J., 2002, Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement, 117
  10. 10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.845 · DOI
  11. Borkowski J. G., 1988, Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences, 73
  12. Brown A. L., 1978, Advances in instructional psychology, 1, 77
  13. Butler D., 2011, Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 73
  14. Campione J. C., 1985, Thinking and learning skills, 317
  15. 10.2307/1129635 · DOI
  16. Collins Block C., 2002, Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices
  17. Dunlosky J., 2009, Metacognition
  18. Flavell J. H., 2002, Cognitive development
  19. Goswami U., 2008, Cognitive development: The learning brain
  20. Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking, fast and slow
  21. Kintsch W., 1998, Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition
  22. 10.2307/1165955 · DOI
  23. 10.4324/9780203810033 · DOI
  24. National Reading Panel, 2000, Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. (National Institute of Child health and human Development, NIH, DHHS)
  25. 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1787/9789264195905-en · DOI
  27. 10.1787/9789264091450-en · DOI
  28. OECD., 2010, PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn. Student engagement, strategies and practices
  29. 10.1787/9789264167872-en · DOI
  30. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_7 · DOI
  31. 10.4324/9781410612762 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10648-006-9014-3 · DOI
  33. Pieschl S. (2007). To calibrate or not to calibrate? Conditions and processes of metacognitive calibration during hypermedia learning (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Münster, Germany). Retrieved from urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-14569461694
  34. 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Pintrich P. R., 1991, The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)
  36. Pressley M., 2002, Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, 11
  37. Schlagmüller M., 2007, WLST 7-12. Würzburger Lesestrategie Wissenstest für die Klassen 7 bis 12 [Wurzburg knowledge of reading strategies test for Grades 7 to 12]
  38. Schneider W., 2010, Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction, 54
  39. 10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2 · DOI
  40. Schneider W., 2008, A handbook of metamemory and memory, 391
  41. Schneider W., 1997, Memory development between two and twenty
  42. van de vijver F., 1997, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1: Theory and method, 257
  43. Weinstein C. E., 1987, Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI)
  44. Wild K.-P., 1992, Arbeiten zur empirischen Pädagogik und pädagogischen Psychologie, 20
  45. 10.1080/00461520.2010.517150 · DOI
  46. Winne P. H., 1998, Metacognition in educational theory and practice, 277

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Artelt, C., & Schneider, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Bamberg (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2015-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
1-32
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W2242525186
Cited by
75
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
metacognitive knowledge, learning strategies, strategy use, reading skills, self-regulated reading, strategy knowledge, cross-national comparison, PISA 2009, adolescents, moderation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review