Cited by 1,589Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Leadership and InnovationEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Studying as Self-Regulated Learning

Philip H. Winne, Allyson Fiona Hadwin·1998·Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice

Abstract

Asked what they are doing as they engage in school-or university-related activities, students might say, “Pm working on my project,” “Pm doing homework,” or, commonly, “Pm studying.” Charting the boundaries of studying is a fuzzy task. Colloquially, the range of activities it encompasses is nearly synonymous with all the activities that probabilistically lead to “a relatively permanent change in cognitive structure.”1 However, several features may distinguish studying from the subsuming category of learning activities. In particular, studying:1. Rarely includes direct or frequent intervention by a teacher. 2. Is often a solo activity, although peer mediation is also common. 3. Often originates with a general goal set by a teacher that the studentsubsequently interprets at the studying session’s outset and refines in a recursive way as studying unfolds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781410602350-19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Winne and Hadwin's model specified the recursively applied forms of metacognitive monitoring and feedback that change information over time, thus influencing goals, as self-regulated learners engage in an assignment.

    “… specified the recursively applied forms of metacognitive monitoring and feedback that change information over time (thus influencing goals) as self-regulated learners engage in an assignment. (p. 203)”

    From Developing the theory of formative assessment (2009) · cites this paper as Winne and Hadwin (1998)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
Publisher
Routledge
Published
1998-03-01
Pages
291-318
OpenAlex
W1775995898
Cited by
1,589
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 44
FWCI
8.82
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
student self-regulation, studying, learning strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review