The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structural Characteristics of Norms
Abstract
The idea norm is now such a familiar one to educators that its meaning in ordinary discourse is generally assumed. Yet, as with many abstractions that fall readily into general use, this concept refers to highly complex phenomena within which many component processes can be recognized and a large number of meaningful characteristics distinguished. For example, norms may be described as ambiguous, highly restrictive, poorly crystallized, or very potent, although it is not clear how these characteristics are related to one another or precisely what they mean. In the absence of some scheme for representing the structure of a norm, much of its potential as a tool for analysis of the instructional group fails to be realized. In this chapter a model is introduced which tries to incorporate the essential properties of the idea. A large number of characteristics of this model will then be examined, and each will be related to observable phenomena. Each property of a norm will be defined both conceptually and operationally. Thus, the construction of the model represents an attempt to provide a way of thinking about norms and their properties in a differentiated and logical way and to suggest methods of measuring these properties with relative precision. To the degree that the attempt is successful, it may provide a useful means for the study of such problems as the socialization of the child, the integration of students into the classroom group, and the relation of individual personality to the social environment of instructional groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Recent Developments in Role Theory
Biddle, B. J. (1986) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435 · Cited by 2,358
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration
Cramton, C. D. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098 · Cited by 1,916
A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness
Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1996) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679604900506 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, J. M.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1960-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 136-163
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W3109455778
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Characteristics of Norms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016146816006101007
- The paper
- Jackson, J. M. (1960). Structural Characteristics of Norms. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816006101007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.