Cited by 1,408Educational methodologies and cognitive developmentInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation Pedagogy and Practices

A Model of School Learning

Carroll, John B.·1963·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146816306400801

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carroll, J. B.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Carroll, John B.
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
1963-05
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W4210343561
Cited by
1,408
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 35
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
school learning, learning models, educational theory, student learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review