Cited by 173Educational Assessment and PedagogyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingStudent Assessment and Feedback

Some Theoretical Issues Relating to Educational Evaluation

Bloom, Benjamin S.·1969·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146816907001003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bloom extended formative evaluation to the classroom, emphasizing ongoing assessment to diagnose student misunderstandings and tailor instruction to promote mastery learning.

    “A few years later, Bloom [23] extended this idea to the classroom, emphasizing the use of ongoing assessment to diagnose student misunderstandings and tailor instruction to promote mastery learning.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloom, B. S.
Corresponding author
Bloom, Benjamin S.
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
1969-08
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
26-50
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W4210255027
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
  • Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
educational assessment, evaluation theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review