Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 862

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers

Huberman, Michael·1989·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Life-cycle research has been around, to be sure, since philosophers and novelists have been studying lives. The more “scientific” treatment of lives, however, has followed disciplinary tracks, each with its “marker” studies or conceptualizations. For example, there is a clear, psychodynamic track running-from Freud through Henry Murray and Gordon Allport and culminating in Erikson’s eight normative “life-crises”1 and Robert White’s Study of Lives.’ There is another, more sociological, track beginning in recent times with the Chicago School and the revival of the oral history tradition, coupled with the development of symbolic interactionism. Along the way, this school has produced some important studies of adult socialization and career patterning. Still another important influence has stemmed from the multivolume studies of “life-span developmental psychology.“3 The evolution of the life-span series has also reflected the conceptual and methodological shifts the field as a whole has undergone since the 1960s. In particular, the influence of the “organicist” approach has been attenuated. We have come to see that many patterns once attributed to age-related influences are in fact as much or more the result of “cohort” or “period” influences, which means that historical or sociological factors need to be counted more heavily.4 We have also learned that human development beyond adolescence is a far more discontinuous, fluid, dialectical, sometimes downright random business once one begins to look at individual lives. Even those of us who had banked heavily on the organicist approach’ have come to admit that “age” is essentially a hollow variable, a sort of receptacle for the interplay of multiple, differentially powerful determinants. What do we know in particular about the careers of teachers? Until the later 1970s, precious little, aside from Becker’s seminal study6 and a perceptive chapter by Peterson on secondary-school teachers.’ Since then, the picture has brightened. At present, both longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches are flourishing. 8 Also, some of the most promising work has come from England.9 We are beginning to understand how teachers’ careers play out and which are the most influential determinants, within and outside the institution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146818909100107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 862

Metadata

Authors
Huberman, M.
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
1989-10
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
31-57
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W1676465888
Cited by
862
References
0
FWCI
32.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016146818909100107
The paper
Huberman, M. (1989). The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146818909100107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.