The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior
Abstract
Trillions of dollars are annually spent on the development and implementation of information technology within the United States and around the world. On average, roughly 50% of such systems are considered failures or fall short of meeting the expectations set forth by management. The lost productivity and high costs associated with these shortcomings necessitate the identification of alternative frameworks for facilitating the successful acceptance and continued internalization of new technologies. Internalization is defined as the effective and continued use of a technology over time. As such, this paper introduces a conceptual model for examining the effect of trust and planned change initiatives on technology adoption behavior. We propose that technology trust and interpersonal trust, when coupled with planned change initiatives, lead to greater technology adoption and internalization. A series of propositions are introduced and examined between trust, planned change, technology adoption, and internalization. Implications and recommendations for future explorations and development are presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We show that readiness is an integral element throughout the entire adoption process instead of a precursor condition (Lippert and Davis 2006).”
From Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors (2021) · cites this paper as Lippert and Davis 2006
In the citing paper
“Thus, the readiness concept is often limited to being a sequential precursor to the broader adoption concept (Lippert and Davis 2006).”
From Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors (2021) · cites this paper as Lippert and Davis 2006
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
DOES FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST? THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEATED TIES FOR CONTRACTUAL CHOICE IN ALLIANCES.
Gulati, R. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256729 · Cited by 4,945
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 · Cited by 4,179
Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations
Gambetta, D. (1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3664 · Cited by 4,045
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- B. Gomolski, 2004, IT Spending and Profitability: What the Numbers Show
- U.S. Government Accounting Office, 2003, Contracting for Information Technology
- Standish Group, 1994, The CHAOS Report
- R. Agarwal, 1998, Decision Sciences, 22, 15
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Argyris, 1985, Action Science
- 10.2307/258786 · DOI · Paper page
- K. Lewin, 1951, Field Theory in the Social Sciences
- D.E. Denning, Proceedings of the 1993 Association for Computing Management SIGSAC on New Security Paradigms Workshop, 36
- Gartner Group, 2003, IT Spending: How do You Stack Up?
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors
Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7 · Cited by 637
A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology
Or, C. K. L., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2888 · Cited by 586
The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students
Rodríguez, T. E., & Lozano, P. M. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.012 · Cited by 292
Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience
Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21462 · Cited by 289
“To support this view, Lippert and Davis (2006) posit two kinds of trust that play an essential role in the technology adoption process, namely interpersonal trust and technology trust.”
BackgroundCasey, T. W., & Wilson‐Evered, E. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.022 · Cited by 163
Customers perspectives on adoption of cloud computing in banking sector
Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Husin, A. R. C., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2016) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-016-0270-8 · Cited by 121
“The concept of ‘‘Trust’’ has been extensively analysed and a great amount of research has focused on understanding this construct, its acceptable dimensions and its effects on human behavior [17, 49, 86].”
BackgroundNgugi, B. K., Pelowski, M. J., & Ogembo, J. G. (2010) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2010.tb00307.x · Cited by 112
CRM literature: conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis
Kevork, E. K., & Vrechopoulos, A. (2009) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634500910928362 · Cited by 112
Role of trust in customer attitude and behaviour formation towards social service robots
Corte, V. D., Sepe, F., Gürsoy, D., & Prisco, A. (2023) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103587 · Cited by 115
Internet voting in Estonia 2005–2019: Evidence from eleven elections
Ehin, P., Solvak, M., Willemson, J., & Vinkel, P. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101718 · Cited by 95
Schwartz, T., Stevens, G., Jakobi, T., Denef, S., Ramirez, L., Wulf, V., & Randall, D. W. (2014) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu009 · Cited by 97
“Research in other domains, however, has already addressed questions concerning the attitudes of users towards interactive technologies based on critical incidents when using them, or software failures overall (Feng and Lutz, 2008; Lippert and Davis, 2006).”
BackgroundTrust in a ‘trust-free’ system: Blockchain acceptance in the banking and finance sector
Gan, Q., & Lau, R. Y. K. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123050 · Cited by 96
User preference for an IoT healthcare application for lifestyle disease management
Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2017) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.03.006 · Cited by 81
Resistance to Change: Causes and Strategies as an Organizational Challenge
Damawan, A. H., & Azizah, S. N. (2020) · ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.200120.010 · Cited by 61
“…as a result of employee resistance to change turned out to be referred to as one of the main obstacles to organizational change initiatives (Lippert & Davis, 2006), and cause negative impacts such as reducing employee motivation (Ude & Diala, 2015), less than optimal results of failure…”
BackgroundFunction allocation in complex systems: reframing an old problem
Challenger, R., Clegg, C., & Shepherd, C. (2013) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.790482 · Cited by 53
“…work systems often fail to deliver their anticipated benefits, with evidence arising from surveys, case studies, public enquiries, expert panels, economic analyses and longitudinal studies of productivity (e.g. Landauer 1995; Clegg et al. 1997; Brynjolfsson and Hitt 1998; Lippert and Davis 2006).”
BackgroundAboelmaged, M., & Hashem, G. (2018) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.07.009 · Cited by 50
Huang, R., Kim, M., & Lennon, S. J. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101811 · Cited by 60
Kruszyńska-Fischbach, A., Sysko-Romańczuk, S., Napiórkowski, T. M., Napiórkowska, A., & Kozakiewicz, D. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19073973 · Cited by 61
“Keeping in mind that a responses:questions ratio of 10:1 is best, 5:1 satisfactory and 3:1 acceptable [25], our 11.”
BackgroundHumaidi, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2017) · Health Information Management Journal · doi:10.1177/1833358317700255 · Cited by 43
“This is also supported by Lippert and Davis (2006) who stated that trust is an important element in the organisation as trust affects an employee’s willingness to adopt the security technology implemented in the organisation.”
BackgroundRodríguez, T. E., & Romero-Alonso, M. M. (2013) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.810779 · Cited by 41
“This is a common challenge faced during IT implementation (Jones 2003, Lippert and Davis 2006).”
BackgroundLim, W. M. (2015) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551515577913 · Cited by 42
The Role of Perceived Risk and Security Level in Building Trust in E-government Solutions
Ejdys, J., Ginevičius, R., Rózsa, Z., & Jánošková, K. (2019) · E+M Ekonomie a Management · doi:10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-014 · Cited by 49
“Trust is seen as one of the success factors ensuring an effective adoption of technologies (Lippert & Davis, 2006).”
BackgroundThe role of teams, culture, and capacity in the transfer of organizational practices
Lucas, L. M. (2010) · The Learning Organization · doi:10.1108/09696471011059813 · Cited by 40
“Trust is essential to the process as it permits employees to be less concerned about their expertise and how others may use what they have acquired against them (Lippert and Davis, 2006).”
BackgroundRodríguez, T. E., Lozano, P. M., & Romero-Alonso, M. M. (2012) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-10254 · Cited by 40
Impact of cultural factors on attitude toward using ERP systems in public hospitals
Rodríguez, T. E., & Bartual-Sopena, L. (2014) · Revista de Contabilidad · doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.04.002 · Cited by 39
Skoumpopoulou, D., Wong, A. K. L., Ng, P. M. L., & Lo, M. F. (2018) · The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies) · Cited by 37
An integrated framework of change management for social CRM implementation
Pour, M. J., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2020) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-020-00479-z · Cited by 33
Factors Influencing ChatGpt Adoption for Product Research and Information Retrieval
Gude, V. (2023) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2023.2280918 · Cited by 32
“34 In this context, trust acts as a critical catalyst for encouraging users to fully embrace and effectively use ChatGPT’s features and functionalities.”
Koo, C., & Wati, Y. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.3217/jucs-016-13-1801 · Cited by 32
Müller, L. S., Nohe, C., Reiners, S., Becker, J., & Hertel, G. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2196598 · Cited by 39
“The signi fi cance of this insight cannot be overstated, because it can help explain why some adoption initiatives succeed and others fail (Bahman-ziari, Pearson, and Crosby 2003; Lippert and Davis 2006; McKnight 2005).”
BackgroundSociocultural paradoxes and issues in e-learning use in higher education Africa
Njenga, J. K. (2017) · Globalisation Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2017.1390664 · Cited by 22
Privacy concerns and benefits in SaaS adoption by individual users
Gashami, J. P. G., Chang, Y., Rho, J., & Park, M.-C. (2016) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666915571428 · Cited by 36
“The concept of Trust has been extensively analyzed and a considerable amount of research has focused on understanding this construct, its plausible dimensions and its effects on human behaviour (Be´langer and Carter, 2008; Gefen et al., 2003; Lippert and Davis, 2006).”
BackgroundSuccessful IT governance in SMES: An application of the Technology–Organisation–Environment theory
Olaitan, O. O., & Flowerday, S. (2016) · South African journal of information management · doi:10.4102/sajim.v18i1.696 · Cited by 22
Rethinking the Design of Low-Cost Point-of-Care Diagnostic Devices
Kimani, F., Mwangi, S., Kwasa, B., Kusow, A. M., Ngugi, B. K., Chen, J., Liu, X., Cademartiri, R., & Thuo, M. (2017) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi8110317 · Cited by 22
Trust in Mobile Banking Adoption in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework
Masrek, M. N., & Uzir, A. (2012) · Cited by 22
A dual-factor theory of WTs adoption in aged care service operations – a cross-country analysis
Khaksar, S. M. S., Jahanshahi, A. A., Slade, B., & Asian, S. (2020) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2018-0449 · Cited by 19
Personal Data Collection via the Internet: The Role of Privacy Sensitivity and Technology Trust
Lippert, S. K., & Swiercz, P. M. (2007) · Journal of international technology and information management · doi:10.58729/1941-6679.1185 · Cited by 18
“In technology trust, the trust assessment is formed by an individual toward the technology and results from the individual’s attitude based on past experiences and expectations of how the system will function in the future (Lippert, in press; Lippert & Davis, 2006; Lippert & Forman, 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBijaniaram, R., Tehrani, M., Noori, R., & Pak, J. (2023) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-023-01178-z · Cited by 21
“…factors that often hinder the introduction and adoption of these technologies in the work-place since an organization’s IT usage, adoption, and implementation are all determined by the level of user acceptance of the newly introduced technology (Agar-wal & Karahanna, 2000; Lippert & Davis, 2006).”
Janmethakulwat, A., & Thanasopon, B. (2024) · The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics · doi:10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.08.001 · Cited by 14
Key Factors Affecting Blockchain Adoption in Organizations
Mohammed, A. S., Potdar, V. M., & Yang, L. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7530-3_35 · Cited by 15
Marinakis, Y., Walsh, S. T., & Harms, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3116204 · Cited by 13
“Theories on trust [21], the technology acceptance model (TAM) [22], and the social construction of technology (SCOT) [23] provide theoretical backgrounds to address successful disruptive technology-based NPD decision-making processes.”
BackgroundDis/Trust and data-driven technologies
Dueñas-Cid, D., & Calzati, S. (2023) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2023.4.1727 · Cited by 18
Examining the Influence of Artificial Intelligence Implementation in HRM Practices Using T-O-E Model
Siradhana, N. K., & Arora, R. G. (2024) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/09722629241231458 · Cited by 18
Drones in food delivery: an analysis of consumer values and perspectives
Abbasi, G. A., Rodríguez-López, M. E., Higueras‐Castillo, E., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2024.2407496 · Cited by 12
“In addition, trust is identified as a key factor in the successful adoption of new technology (Lippert and Davis 2006).”
Importance of Trust in IoT based Wearable Device Adoption by Patient: An Empirical Investigation
Bhatt, V., & Chakraborty, S. (2020) · International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC) · doi:10.1109/i-smac49090.2020.9243533 · Cited by 12
Trust in Government or in Technology? What Really Drives Internet Voting
Abdala, M. B., Plescia, C., Boyer, M. M., & Brunetti, A. L. (2025) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129251321424 · Cited by 11
“…a framework based on a trustor that is willing to give their trust (i.e., citizens), a trustee that provides the service and generates trust (i.e., the government) and an intermediary that contributed to the provision of the service (i.e., the i-voting technology) (Lippert and Davis 2006).”
InfluentialRomanov, B., Dueñas-Cid, D., & Leets, P. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102068 · Cited by 23
Organizational Change and the Imperatives of Managing Employee Resistance: A Conceptual Review
Tamunomiebi, M. D., & AKPAN, E. P. (2021) · Journal of Strategic Management · doi:10.47672/jsm.683 · Cited by 10
“…as a result of employee resistance to change turned out to be referred to as one of the main obstacles to organizational change initiatives (Lippert & Davis, 2006), and cause negative impacts such as reducing employee motivation (Ude & Diala, 2015), less than optimal results of failure…”
BackgroundWagner, T. F. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58559-8_22 · Cited by 10
Lippert, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1504/ijitm.2008.015888 · Cited by 10
“If this assertion is true, then an individual who is resistant to change will not exert the necessary energy to identify the utility of the new technology (Lippert and Davis, 2006), specifically regarding how the system will enhance job performance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe Hidden Costs of Keeping Current: Technology and Libraries
Cunningham, K. (2010) · Journal of Library Administration · doi:10.1080/01930821003634955 · Cited by 9
“The introduction of technology is “costly in terms of time, human and capital resources, and organizational energy” (Lippert & Davis, 2006, p. 435).”
BackgroundParty Cues and Trust in Remote Internet Voting: Data from Estonia 2005–2019
Ehin, P., & Solvak, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_6 · Cited by 14
The Trustworthy and Trusted Web
Cofta, P. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Web Science · doi:10.1561/1800000016 · Cited by 8
Murrar, A., Paz, V. C., Batra, M. M., & Yerger, D. B. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/jsit-12-2023-0335 · Cited by 7
Leick, B., Gretzinger, S., & Makkonen, T. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003034001 · Cited by 7
Rath, S. P., Tripathy, R., & Jain, N. K. (2023) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50188-3_11 · Cited by 7
Dueñas-Cid, D. (2024) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3657054.3657262 · Cited by 7
Technology Trust: From Antecedents to Perceived Performance Effects
Kivijärvi, H., Leppänen, A., & Hallikainen, P. (2013) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2013.510 · Cited by 8
A Novel and Customizable Framework for IoT Based Smart Home Nursing for Elderly Care
Boobalan, J., & Malleswaran, M. (2019) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32150-5_3 · Cited by 7
Organising Self-Referential Taxi Work with mICT: The Case of the London Black Cab Drivers
Elaluf-Calderwood, S. (2010) · London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 7
"Organizational Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Adoption"
Palade, M., & Căruțașu, G. (2023) · Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara Transactions on Engineering and Management · doi:10.59168/fdms6321 · Cited by 12
“They demonstrate that readiness is a natural aspect of the adoption process, rather than a pre-requisite condition [16].”
BackgroundThe Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in the E-Commerce Trade of Healthcare Industry
Kong, Y., Hou, Y., & Sun, S. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-3631-8_8 · Cited by 6
Mazey, N. C. H. L., & Wingreen, S. C. (2017) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1177/1550147717717388 · Cited by 6
Institutionalization and adoption of digital technology in Thai maritime industry
Janmethakulwat, A., & Thanasopon, B. (2025) · Maritime Business Review · doi:10.1108/mabr-07-2024-0056 · Cited by 8
Assessment of Factors Influencing Intent-to-Use Big Data Analytics in an Organization: Pilot Study
Madhlangobe, W., & Wang, L. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2018.00277 · Cited by 5
“Technology trust relates to an individual’s willingness to be vulnerable to an information technology based on expectations of technology predictability, reliability, and utility [10].”
BackgroundGashami, J. P. G., Chang, Y., Rho, J. J., & Park, M.-C. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 5
Fintech Adoption Factors: A Study on an Educated Romanian Population
Belaşcu, L., Neguț, C. A., Dinca, Z., Boţoroga, C.-A., & Dumitrescu, D. G. (2023) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc13120262 · Cited by 5
“Interestingly, innovators, who typically exhibit characteristics such as high wealth, education, active social participation, and leadership, are often the first to adopt new services or goods, such as internet banking [14].”
BackgroundChartered Accountants’ perception of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Brands, C., Mayer, C., & Oosthuizen, R. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419766 · Cited by 7
“It affects how people perceive and interpret the world, as well as their willingness to accept new ideas or change their behaviours (Lippert and Davis, 2006; Tu and Hu, 2018).”
BackgroundIncorporating Social Trust into Design Practices for Secure Systems
Cofta, P., Lacohée, H., & Hodgson, P. (2010) · International Journal of Dependable and Trustworthy Information Systems · doi:10.4018/jdtis.2010100101 · Cited by 4
Phương, N. N. D., & Trường, H. V. (2021) · TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC ĐẠI HỌC MỞ THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH - KINH TẾ VÀ QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH · doi:10.46223/hcmcoujs.econ.vi.17.2.1966.2022 · Cited by 4
“Mức độ chấp nhận của người dùng là một yếu tố quan trọng cần xem xét vì nó quyết định việc áp dụng, triển khai và sử dụng công nghệ thông tin trong tổ chức (Agarwal & Karahanna, 2000; Lippert & Davis, 2006).”
Implementing Smart Contracts in the Syndicated Loan Market: An Issue of Adoption
Malan, M., & Steyn, R. (2019) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2019.2929750 · Cited by 4
Understanding Innovation Deployment and Evaluation in Healthcare: The Triality Framework
Sharma, U., Barnett, J. C., & Clarke, M. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/35671 · Cited by 4
Smith, R. E. (2013) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 4
Abdala, M. B. (2024) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102851 · Cited by 3
Patel, P. C., Parida, V., & Tran, P. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100269 · Cited by 4
Determinants of Trust in Smart Technologies
Papenkordt, J., & Thommes, K. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99235-4_13 · Cited by 4
Managing the trust relationship in Financial Services Information Systems
Chan, W. T., & Fengwei, Y. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering · doi:10.1109/icife.2010.5609285 · Cited by 3
“Research shows that the type of trust varies - trust may develop between individuals [9]; between individuals and organizations [10]; and between individuals and Information Systems [11,12,13].”
BackgroundNgugi, B. K., Tarasewich, P., & Recce, M. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2012010103 · Cited by 3
“For example, about fifty percent of information technologies do not get accepted by users and are considered failures; that is, they fall short of meeting the expectations set forth by technology managers (Lippert & Davis, 2006).”
BackgroundEnablers and impediments of RFID implementation in health service operations
Aboelmaged, M. G. S. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS) · doi:10.1109/icsess.2017.8342899 · Cited by 3
“Therefore, the potential advantages of new innovation may not be foreseen and retained unless resistance to that innovation is minimized [32] [33].”
BackgroundApproach and Process for Effective Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation
Kadel, L. M., Ahmad, F., & Bhattarai, G. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73569-2_18 · Cited by 3
Ferreira, S. A., & Andrade, A. (2011) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 2
Pistilli, L., & Pennarola, F. (2016) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38974-5_8 · Cited by 2
Ndombi, C. L., Kyalo, D. N., & Mulwa, A. S. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) · doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.771 · Cited by 2
“…(needs assessment) and capacities and motivation (feasibility studies) are carried out which then followed by choice of relevant initiatives what Geraci (1997), Lippert & Davis (2006) and Lippitt et al (1958) refer to as goal setting and progressive change objects, action plans and strategies.”
BackgroundFirm-Specific Determinants of Mechanisation: The Case of Coir Industry in Kerala
Raseena, K. K. (2022) · SEDME (Small Enterprises Development Management & Extension Journal) A worldwide window on MSME Studies · doi:10.1177/09708464221130204 · Cited by 2
“From the studies of Atanu et al. 1994), Gale (1998), Burton et al. (1999), Daberkow et al. (2003), Adewuyi et al. (2006), Lippert and Davis (2006), Varukolu (2007), Katungi (2007), Lin and Zhang (2009), Gosh (2010), Kuriakose et al. (2011), Okello et al. (2014), Narayanamoorthy et al. (2014) and…”
(2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7 · Cited by 3
O’Connor, Y. (2013) · Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) · Cited by 2
Technology trust antecedents: Building the platform for technology-enabled performance
Leppänen, A. (2010) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 2
Motwani, J., & Kataria, A. (2022) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5864-8.ch013 · Cited by 2
Mattisson, M., Lundahl, R., Liljeroos, M., Lang, H. F., Johansson, P., Strömberg, A., Pak, N.-Y., Jaarsma, T., & Kato, N. (2026) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvag075 · Cited by 1
Arora, R. G., & Siradhana, N. K. (2026) · South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management · doi:10.1177/23220937261470890 · Cited by 2
Jogos e Simuladores no Ensino Superior de Economia e Gestão em Portugal
Lopes, C. P., & Andrade, A. (2008) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 1
A Survey Of Mobile Health System Infusion Among Healthcare Practitioners.
O’Connor, Y., O’Reilly, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2013) · European Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 1
Chan, W. T., & Fengwei, Y. (2010) · IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) · doi:10.1109/tencon.2010.5686428 · Cited by 1
“Research shows that the type of trust varies - trust may develop between individuals [4]; between individuals and organizations [5]; and between individuals and Information Systems [6, 7, 8].”
BackgroundImplementation and Acceptance of a Discovery Tool
Dahl, D., & MacDonald, P. (2012) · Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch021 · Cited by 1
Effectiveness of Online Teaching Learning Process
Jhawar, N., & Nandedkar, T. (2022) · IIMS Journal of Management Science · doi:10.1177/0976030x221083033 · Cited by 4
Grammarly adoption among higher-education students in Yogyakarta
Amali, M. T. (2024) · Bricolage Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi · doi:10.30813/bricolage.v10i1.4997 · Cited by 3
Does Trust Matter to Use Hotel Service Robot in COVID-19 Pandemic?
Chung, H. C., & Chung, N. (2023) · Journal of Smart Tourism · doi:10.52255/smarttourism.2023.3.2.2 · Cited by 1
“They adopt such technology because they trust that technology (Lee & Wan, 2010; Lippert & Davis, 2006).”
University Task Force Deepens Academic Involvement in ERP System
Crow, M. (2009) · Advances in IT personnel and project management · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-400-2.ch025 · Cited by 1
Wilson‐Evered, E., & Zeleznikow, J. (2021) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_4 · Cited by 1
Spencer, A. J. (2011) · Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lippert, S. K., & Davis, M.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- Shenandoah University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 434-448
- ISSN
- 0165-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6485
- OpenAlex
- W2167860992
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- trust in technology, interpersonal trust, planned change, technology adoption, organizational change, information technology implementation, conceptual model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review