The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior
Abstract
Trillions of dollars are annually spent on the development and implementation of information technology within the United States and around the world. On average, roughly 50% of such systems are considered failures or fall short of meeting the expectations set forth by management. The lost productivity and high costs associated with these shortcomings necessitate the identification of alternative frameworks for facilitating the successful acceptance and continued internalization of new technologies. Internalization is defined as the effective and continued use of a technology over time. As such, this paper introduces a conceptual model for examining the effect of trust and planned change initiatives on technology adoption behavior. We propose that technology trust and interpersonal trust, when coupled with planned change initiatives, lead to greater technology adoption and internalization. A series of propositions are introduced and examined between trust, planned change, technology adoption, and internalization. Implications and recommendations for future explorations and development are presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We show that readiness is an integral element throughout the entire adoption process instead of a precursor condition (Lippert and Davis 2006).”
From Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors (2021) · cites this paper as Lippert and Davis 2006
In the citing paper
“Thus, the readiness concept is often limited to being a sequential precursor to the broader adoption concept (Lippert and Davis 2006).”
From Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors (2021) · cites this paper as Lippert and Davis 2006
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
DOES FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST? THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEATED TIES FOR CONTRACTUAL CHOICE IN ALLIANCES.
Gulati, R. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256729 · Cited by 4,945
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 · Cited by 4,179
Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations
Gambetta, D. (1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3664 · Cited by 4,045
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- B. Gomolski, 2004, IT Spending and Profitability: What the Numbers Show
- U.S. Government Accounting Office, 2003, Contracting for Information Technology
- Standish Group, 1994, The CHAOS Report
- R. Agarwal, 1998, Decision Sciences, 22, 15
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Argyris, 1985, Action Science
- 10.2307/258786 · DOI · Paper page
- K. Lewin, 1951, Field Theory in the Social Sciences
- D.E. Denning, Proceedings of the 1993 Association for Computing Management SIGSAC on New Security Paradigms Workshop, 36
- Gartner Group, 2003, IT Spending: How do You Stack Up?
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors
Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7 · Cited by 637
A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology
Or, C. K. L., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2888 · Cited by 586
The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students
Rodríguez, T. E., & Lozano, P. M. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.012 · Cited by 292
Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience
Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21462 · Cited by 289
“To support this view, Lippert and Davis (2006) posit two kinds of trust that play an essential role in the technology adoption process, namely interpersonal trust and technology trust.”
BackgroundCasey, T. W., & Wilson‐Evered, E. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.022 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Lippert, S. K., & Davis, M.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- Shenandoah University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 434-448
- ISSN
- 0165-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6485
- OpenAlex
- W2167860992
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- trust in technology, interpersonal trust, planned change, technology adoption, organizational change, information technology implementation, conceptual model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
