The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas
Open accessAbstract
The exchange of information among organizational employees is a vital component of the knowledge-management process. Modem information and telecommunication technology is available to support such exchanges across time and distance barriers. However, organizations investing in this type of technology often face difficulties in encouraging their employees to use the system to share their ideas. This paper elaborates on previous research, suggesting that sharing personal insights with one's co-workers may carry a cost for some individuals which may yield, at the aggregate level, a co-operation dilemma, similar to a public-good dilemma. A review of the research on different types of public-good dilemmas provides some indications of the specific interventions that may help organizations encourage the kind of social dynamics that will increase overall knowledge sharing. These interventions can be classified into three categories: interventions aimed at restructuring the pay-offs for contributing, those that try to increase efficacy perceptions, and those that make employees' sense of group identity and personal responsibility more salient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498
Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.
Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0026570 · Cited by 1,252
The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity Analysis of a Theory-Based Measure
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256941 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190500083020 · Cited by 1,170
Self-citationWhat drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms
Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015 · Cited by 1,016
Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors
Ismail Al‐Alawi, A., Yousif Al‐Marzooqi, N., & Fraidoon Mohammed, Y. (2007) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270710738898 · Cited by 853
A model of knowledge‐sharing motivation
Gagné, M. (2009) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20298 · Cited by 608
Learning in the Twenty-First-Century Workplace
Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 687-710
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2117767124
- Cited by
- 1,355
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 60.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840602235001
- The paper
- Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602235001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.