The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta
Abstract
In this paper we develop a theoretical model that helps to understand change in mature organizational fields by emphasizing the role of competing institutional logics as part of a radical change process. Our investigation into a large-scale, government-led health reform initiative in Alberta, Canada, is based upon a qualitative case study approach to understanding the process of field recomposition. This study focuses on the later portions of change in an organizational field — that is, rather than explaining the sources of change, we investigate how a field becomes re-established after the implementation of a radical structural change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The antecedents of deinstitutionalization
Oliver, C. (1992) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069201300403 · Cited by 1,746
The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason
Bourdieu, P. (1975) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847501400602 · Cited by 1,483 · cited 1×
“DiMaggio (1983) suggested the word ‘field’ ‘in the dual sense in which Bourdieu (1975) uses “champ”, to signify both common purpose and an arena of strategy and conflict’ (1983: 149).”
BackgroundBusiness planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393853 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299 · Cited by 3,519
Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431 · Cited by 1,571
Interlevel Influences on the Reconstruction of Professional Role Identity
Chreim, S., Williams, B. E. (., & Hinings, C. R. (. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28226248 · Cited by 443
Self-citationAn Institutional Logics Perspective on the Gig Economy
Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., & Piscicelli, L. (2020) · Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000066005 · Cited by 118
Diab, A. (2021) · Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jaee-06-2020-0126 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 351-384
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W1966817063
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840605050872
- The paper
- Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
