The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virtue in Organizations: Moral Identity as a Foundation for Moral Agency
Abstract
Framing issues of organizational ethics in terms of virtues and moral agency (rather than in terms of rules and ethical behavior) has implications for the way social science addresses matters of morality in organizations. In particular, attending to matters of virtue and moral agency directs attention to the moral identity, or self-concept, of persons, and to the circumstances that influence self-identity. This article develops parallels between philosophical theories of virtue and the concept of moral identity as developed in social cognitive identity theory. Explicating notions of virtue and moral agency in terms of social cognitive identity theory, in turn, helps direct attention to a range of factors—including both organizational and extraorganizational, macro-cultural ones—that can foster or inhibit moral agency in organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 · Cited by 3,401 · cited 1×
“Identity theories in social psychology allow that identity is complex, composed of multiple elements (Brewer and Gardner 1996; Deaux et al. 1995; Hoelter 1985; Stryker 1980; Weaver and Agle 2002).”
BackgroundMechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 · Cited by 2,680
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726703056001448 · Cited by 1,372
Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers
Jackall, R. (1988) · International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/bf01390690 · Cited by 1,296
Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131888 · Cited by 1,080
Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective
Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134370 · Cited by 954
Self-citationBusiness planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393853 · Cited by 675
Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A., & Austin, J. R. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.5.475.7814 · Cited by 614
Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influences of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors
Butterfield, K. D., Trevin, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700537004 · Cited by 508
Self-citationMacrocultures: Determinants and Consequences
Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9412190217 · Cited by 444 · cited 1×
“The processes by which behavioral and cognitive patterns diffuse through an institutional field are well known (e.g. Abrahamson and Fombrun 1994; McKinley et al. 2000; Rogers 2003).”
BackgroundThe Misappropriation of MacIntyre
Beadle, R. (2002) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.5840/pom2002226 · Cited by 59 · cited 2×
“(But skeptics claim that the creatively destructive (Schumpeter 1950) dynamism of the market makes business an unsuitable venue for cultivating virtue (Beadle 2002; Dobson 1997; MacIntyre 1981).)”
Background
Cited by
Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306294258 · Cited by 1,837
Self-citationA Model of Third Parties' Morally Motivated Responses to Mistreatment in Organizations
O'reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0311 · Cited by 223
Re-Imagining the Morality of Management: A Modern Virtue Ethics Approach
Moore, G. (2008) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200818435 · Cited by 189
Lost in Translation: The Construct Representation of Character Virtues
Ng, V., & Tay, L. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619886014 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, G. R.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-368
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W1994791463
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 26.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.