Organizational Memory Studies
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides an overview and discussion of the rapidly growing literature on organizational memory studies (OMS). We define OMS as an inquiry into the ways that remembering and forgetting shape, and are shaped by, organizations and organizing processes. The contribution of this article is threefold. We briefly review what we understand by organizational memory and explore some key debates and points of contestation in the field. Second, we identify four different perspectives that have been developed in OMS (functional, interpretive, critical and performative) and expand upon each perspective by showcasing articles published over the past decade. In particular, we examine four papers previously published in Organization Studies to show the distinctiveness of each perspective. Finally, we identify a number of areas for future research to facilitate the future development of OMS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A key challenge in maintaining organizational memory is ensuring that knowledge is not confined to individual leaders but is shared and institutionalized throughout the organization.
“The study by Foroughi, et al. [68] expressed that a key challenge in maintaining organizational memory is ensuring that knowledge is not confined to individual leaders, but rather shared and institutionalized throughout the organization.”
From Ensuring leadership continuity: An integrative review of succession planning, leadership development and organisational memory (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718 · see citing works
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475 · see citing works
Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind
Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Theories of Group Behavior · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 · Cited by 2,700 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similarly, Dacin, Munir and Tracey (2010) emphasized the performativity of material and bodily memory.”
BackgroundWalsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258607 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anos, C. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7607 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The study by Foroughi, et al. [68] expressed that a key challenge in maintaining organizational memory is ensuring that knowledge is not confined to individual leaders, but rather shared and institutionalized throughout the organization.”
- Authors
- Foroughi, H., Coraiola, D. M., Rintamäki, J., Mena, S., & Foster, W. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Hertie School (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Foroughi, Hamid
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-11-27
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1725-1748
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W3095975385
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
- UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Keywords
- institutional memory, memory and forgetting, organizing processes, functional perspective, interpretive perspective, critical perspective, performative perspective, future research directions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review