An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes
Abstract
Inter-firm relationships are coordinated to a large extent by non-market mecha nisms. The objective of this paper is to identify which of these mechanisms are the most relevant, and how they can be theoretically and empirically combined into discrete alternative modes of organizational coordination between firms. A frame work is developed for evaluating the comparative effectiveness and efficiency of these combinations of coordination mechanisms in the regulation of different types of inter-firm interdependence, drawing on both organization theory and organiza tion economics. By analyzing network forms as mixes of coordination mechanisms, the framework offers a typology of inter-firm organization forms that is much more fine-grained and conducive to network organization design than those previously available. The predictive power of the framework is demonstrated by using the vast empirical research available on various types of networks, showing its capacity to explain the main findings on the use of different network forms for governing dif ferent types of relations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The principal benefits of networking identified in the literature include risk sharing.
“To summarise: the innovation benefits of networking identified by the literature include: risk sharing (Grandori, 1997);”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Grandori, 1997
The type of interdependence characterising network relationships between firms is an important mediating variable in establishing appropriate governance mechanisms that promote innovation.
“The type of interdependence characterising the network relationships between firms was found to be an important mediating variable in terms of establishing the appropriate governance mechanisms that will promote innovation (Grandori, 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Grandori, 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 368
- Authors
- Grandori, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Grandori, Anna
- ORCID
- Grandori, Anna
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 897-925
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W1980212278
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 16.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- inter-firm coordination, coordination mechanisms, non-market mechanisms, inter-firm relationships, organizational theory, organizational economics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review