The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Waiting for Godot”: Regime Change Without Democratization in the Middle East
Abstract
“When will Middle Eastern countries democratize?” is the normative question that guided the literature on regime change in the Arab world during the 1990s. Since significant political changes but no systemic transitions have occurred, this question needs reformulation: what accounts for the persistence of Arab authoritarianism? Escaping thus from the teleological tunnel permits the identification of two major developments. The first is an oscillation between controlled political liberalizations and deliberalizations, and the second consists of five areas of change within regimes: legitimation, elites, institution building, co-optation, and regimes’ reactions to external influences. The second trend is particularly crucial for understanding the durability of authoritarianism in the Arab world. Our findings clarify differences, but also provide bases for comparison between the Arab world and those developing regions where political transition did occur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4135 · Cited by 7,983
Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition.
Ericson, J. E., & Dahl, R. A. (1972) · American Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2711442 · Cited by 7,203
Greenstein, F. I., & Polsby, N. W. (1975) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 2,305
Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America
Chakravarty, S. P., & Przeworski, A. (1992) · Bulletin of Latin American Research · doi:10.2307/3338135 · Cited by 2,181
The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century
Pierre, A. J., & Huntington, S. P. (1992) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045138 · Cited by 1,766
N., E., & Popper, K. (1935) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2016612 · Cited by 1,424
Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
(1917) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1944168 · Cited by 1,064
Popper, K. (1935) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-4177-9 · Cited by 982
Transitions from Authoritarian Rule
O’Donnell, G. (1986) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.72599 · Cited by 861
Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-5813 · Cited by 716
Cited by
The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes
Gerschewski, J. (2013) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738860 · Cited by 1,053
The Arab uprisings and the return of repression
Josua, M., & Edel, M. (2021) · Mediterranean Politics · doi:10.1080/13629395.2021.1889298 · Cited by 65
How Authoritarianism Transforms: A Framework for the Study of Digital Dictatorship
Schlumberger, O., Edel, M., Maati, A., & Saglam, K. (2024) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2023.20 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Albrecht, H., & Schlumberger, O.
- Venue
- International Political Science Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-392
- ISSN
- 0192-5121 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-373X
- OpenAlex
- W2084395037
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Waiting for Godot”: Regime Change Without Democratization in the Middle East. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0192512104045085
- The paper
- Albrecht, H., & Schlumberger, O. (2004). “Waiting for Godot”: Regime Change Without Democratization in the Middle East. International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512104045085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.